I am trying to convince myself that using the Ko system is worthwhile so I wont have to do the true count conversions.
But the more I read about it the more I am concerned.
I finished reading KO Blackjack last week and was rather disappointed that for a book of 150 pages, 1/3 was about the history of card counting and another 1/3 was about not getting caught (both topics which are covered in every other BJ book). So only a 1/3 is about the system and even that is not well written and confusing. There is nothing about the need to adjust the Key count at various deck penetrations so as to not underbet early or overbet late in the shoe.
Then I started reading Blackbelt in Blackjack by Synder to get another look at an unbalanced count system. He says that he thought of the Ko system years ago and knew it didnt really work so he scrapped it and created the Red Seven system. He says the Ko sims in the Ko book have been proven to be wrong but doesnt go into specifics.
Also I noticed that in his Red Seven system his pivot point is 0 and has no Key count (or key count = pivot =0). so why does KO use a key count different from the pivot which only makes for problems early and late? (8dk, irc = -28, kc = -6, pivot = +4)
The more I read the more I learn the more confused I get. Help anyone?
I continue to practice the Hi-low but an looking for a good reason to feel ok about ko which is easier but maybe not that accurate. Not crazy about true count conversions but maybe thats the only way to get the accuracy?
Thought?
Bobp
But the more I read about it the more I am concerned.
I finished reading KO Blackjack last week and was rather disappointed that for a book of 150 pages, 1/3 was about the history of card counting and another 1/3 was about not getting caught (both topics which are covered in every other BJ book). So only a 1/3 is about the system and even that is not well written and confusing. There is nothing about the need to adjust the Key count at various deck penetrations so as to not underbet early or overbet late in the shoe.
Then I started reading Blackbelt in Blackjack by Synder to get another look at an unbalanced count system. He says that he thought of the Ko system years ago and knew it didnt really work so he scrapped it and created the Red Seven system. He says the Ko sims in the Ko book have been proven to be wrong but doesnt go into specifics.
Also I noticed that in his Red Seven system his pivot point is 0 and has no Key count (or key count = pivot =0). so why does KO use a key count different from the pivot which only makes for problems early and late? (8dk, irc = -28, kc = -6, pivot = +4)
The more I read the more I learn the more confused I get. Help anyone?
I continue to practice the Hi-low but an looking for a good reason to feel ok about ko which is easier but maybe not that accurate. Not crazy about true count conversions but maybe thats the only way to get the accuracy?
Thought?
Bobp
Last edited: