Sage
sagefr0g said:
lmao, wel my friend it would'a been good research, if i hadn't of screwed it up, lmao..........
i just deleted my posts on this 44v6 stuff, ...........
hopefully some one can correctly interpret Wong's appendix A.
i'm at this point confused.
:whip:
maybe after my head stops spinning i'll re-run tdca.
In a DAS game there will be times when this will become a thinking players move.. decision. There could be alot at play here that will alter the decision. I saw it at the BASH, split 3's in a very high count pull 2 13's as expected with very big bets out, is it the right move.........again a highly skilled player will be running things through their minds as if they were the latest duo core processor, and even at that it could take many seconds. I saw this happen, once with D-Bo, and also with my play. This is why we do all that we do, and expend all that effort, because in certain circumstances you may..must go against the CW. Very fine games, as we played, offer so many more opportunitys and play decisions than other games, and they also offer far more challenges.
One of the games I will be playing next weekend is a very good DD but as with many DD, no das, no DDOSA, d-10-11 and LS-s-17. Now that game takes alot of higher level decisions
out of play, and is actually less challenging than the 6d that I will also be playing next weekend that has the
best rules in the USA, but also gives me a myriad of indices and plays to consider, employ, and very much complicates matters.
But these are all the challenges that make the game fun for me, the competition, the math, and the joy of coming out on top. Oh ya, the food is good too
CP