NEW James Grosjean article

Sonny

Well-Known Member
#21
FLASH1296 said:
Needless to say, for anyone who has ever read "B.C." there is a lot of talk about advantage play in non-blackjack "carnival" games,
ALL dependent upon "spooking" and "front-loading" dealers.
Not everything he describes relies on hole carding, although I admit that the vast majority does. He also discusses card counting strategies for certain carnival games and side bets as well as next-card and bet-card strategies for sequencers, steerers, sorters, etc. The magazine article even starts with a story about him and a certain Uston team member counting cards in a carnival game. Grosjean is probably best known for hole carding, but he sometimes uses that to support his card counting habit.

On a side note, welcome back RJT! It's nice to know you're still around. And thanks, Qfit, for your insight. I agree with everything you've said. With hole carding you are no longer beating the game, you are beating the dealer. The game is not being dealt by the house rules. You've also had more exposure to the "real pros" than I have.

-Sonny-
 

QFIT

Well-Known Member
#22
Brock Windsor said:
I would reason that you would think the same of a highly intelligent mathematician selling hole-carding software. Lest "the club call the spade black". You have clearly taken a side in the debate and I thought your last statement was a bit out of character in its elitism and thus goads me into the debate of anti-intellectuals vs academic elitism, as represented in Exhibit CAA by AP's vs AT's. Clearly JG can operate brilliantly in both realms, few can. His writing style definitely comes off as anti-intellectual, so I understand that you would respond in kind... but I don't think we need to battle amongst ourselves, you get your money and we'll get ours, live and let live.
BW
I do not sell "hole-carding" software. I sell general purpose Blackjack software that supports everything I can think of for completeness. The dictionary defines racism. That does not mean it supports it. Besides, I already said you should use the info if you gain it. Nowhere in my software does it help you gain it. It just helps you use it.
 

Pro21

Well-Known Member
#23
How many of you turn purple when some casino owner or boss is quoted in some article saying something like, "card counters and cheats". Don't you see you are guilty of exactly the same thing when saying, "spooking and hole carding"?

If you find seeing a dealer's card goes against your personal set of ethics, fine. I know one long time pro who has always felt that way, but he had no problems strapping on a hidden computer when that was legal. For him one was ethical, and one wasn't. I will never understand how the mind works.

But one important point - the book is about FAR more than hole-carding. There is even stuff in there for the card counter. There is a set of index numbers for just about every count you can think of, and yes he gives the index for the lucky ladies count.
 
#24
QFIT said:
I do not sell "hole-carding" software. I sell general purpose Blackjack software that supports everything I can think of for completeness. The dictionary defines racism. That does not mean it supports it. Besides, I already said you should use the info if you gain it. Nowhere in my software does it help you gain it. It just helps you use it.
My dictionary doesn't define that word, because it was printed in 1930 and the term was coined in the mid-30's by National Socialists. I generally avoid using new words as they are too often an attempt to manipulate and deceive.

I do recall seeing some real hole-carding software out there. It's a digital tachistoscope which flashes images of cards at angles like that which you would observe at the table, and it's used for visual training. Either I saw it or I imagined it and will now feel compelled to create it. And perhaps use it, as being unable to distinguish what you saw from what you imagined contraindicates HC play.
 

RJT

Well-Known Member
#25
QFIT - i'm not trying to claim that JG or the people he associates with are nice people - i don't know them. I've heard many negative things and they've certainly pissed off many members of the community. And yes they have a very elitest attitude towards AP, but there is a distinct hierarchy of skills with tracking and spotting being far more difficult to do successfully that counting, bonus whoring or coupon play.
Ethically we are all engaged in at least a grey area with associates that lack any ethics. Is it ethical to mislead players as to the correct staregy? Or to offer a game of skill but refuse to let any player who might be good play? Why should anyone worry about their rights when they don't worry about ours?
I see HC'ing as a natural extension of the cat and mouse game we are always involved in and until the day that the casinos play fair, i'm certainly going to take every advantage i can find that doesn't have the risk of ending my ass up in jail.

RJT.

P.S. Hey Sonny. I'm always floating around, i just don't often get time to post anymore. Think i'm going to be back stateside sometime next year so we should get on Bojack's case and get some sort of get together sorted.
 

shadroch

Well-Known Member
#26
Hey now, don't be putting down the comp counting,coupon whoring faction of our community. I resemble that remark.
Whats next? If you want to argue that playing BJ with a knowledge of the hole card is against the spirit of the game, how is playing with multiple match plays any different?. After all, don't the rules call for a win to pay even money,and aren't you using something not generally available to the other players?
 

sagefr0g

Well-Known Member
#27
RJT said:
....

P.S. Hey Sonny. I'm always floating around, i just don't often get time to post anymore. Think i'm going to be back stateside sometime next year so we should get on Bojack's case and get some sort of get together sorted.
you'd be most welcome at the bj-bash.
 

QFIT

Well-Known Member
#28
These guys can do whatever they want. I just wish they wouldn't talk about it in mainstream magazine articles. Casinos have put much effort into associating us with cheaters. Most everyone considers peeking at an opponent's hand in a card game as cheating. Correct or not, that's the association. They are performing the casinos PR job for them.
 

shadroch

Well-Known Member
#29
In a casno, if the poker dealer sees anyones card, don't they have to announce it to the entire table? How would that be considered cheating?
 

Pro21

Well-Known Member
#30
QFIT said:
These guys can do whatever they want. I just wish they wouldn't talk about it in mainstream magazine articles. Casinos have put much effort into associating us with cheaters. Most everyone considers peeking at an opponent's hand in a card game as cheating. Correct or not, that's the association. They are performing the casinos PR job for them.
They also associate card counting with cheating - so should there be no articles about card counting? I don't think you read the article because it was about beating a casino game by (gasp!) counting cards. It also rightly pointed out that advantage play is not cheating.
 

QFIT

Well-Known Member
#31
Pro21 said:
They also associate card counting with cheating - so should there be no articles about card counting?
That's exactly my point. Some people associate card counting with cheating because the casinos have pushed this association. If APs start associating peeking at an opponent's hand, almost universally associated with cheating by non-APs, the association between counting and cheating is reinforced. Rightly or wrongly. Perception is often more important than reality.

Pro21 said:
I don't think you read the article because it was about beating a casino game by (gasp!) counting cards. It also rightly pointed out that advantage play is not cheating.
No I haven't. Was it written by Mike Kaplan? He writes for Afficianado and knows the game himself; so I would expect him to make that point.
 
#32
RJT said:
QFIT - i'm not trying to claim that JG or the people he associates with are nice people - i don't know them. I've heard many negative things and they've certainly pissed off many members of the community.
You may be confusing different groups of people.

One thing you can be certain of in AP is that the full-timers and the most successful people talk the least on these sites. Those who boast about what they do and put down the play of others, well, you can probably figure out the rest.

RJT said:
And yes they have a very elitest attitude towards AP, but there is a distinct hierarchy of skills with tracking and spotting being far more difficult to do successfully that counting, bonus whoring or coupon play....

There are different kinds of holecarding and some of them are overrated. The most efficient and reliable form of AP is abuse of promotions and comps.

The one thing good AP's have in common is the ability to recognize the odd advantage situation and exploit it, be it a flashing or error-prone dealer, a valuable coupon, a deeply-dealt BJ game or a sloppily-created promotion. There's no status in an AP saying "I holecard" because we all know how. A slot machine AP is more skilled and admirable.
 

ChefJJ

Well-Known Member
#33
KenSmith said:
A correctly trained dealer can deal the game without exposing the hole card to anyone at the table, no matter how hard they try. I don't see how choosing to play at tables with poorly trained and supervised dealers is an ethical transgression.
Kinda like going to Subway when a particular person is working who puts an extra slice of meat on your sandwich. :joker:

good luck
 

Lonesome Gambler

Well-Known Member
#34
Automatic Monkey said:
One thing you can be certain of in AP is that the full-timers and the most successful people talk the least on these sites. Those who boast about what they do and put down the play of others, well, you can probably figure out the rest..
I won't pretend to be an internet genius, but from the little "investigating" I've done pertaining to various unsavory characters online (I'm a curious person), a few of them seem to be actually legit, successful players. They just also happen to have an almost unrealistically abrasive online persona. I have a theory about this...
 

RJT

Well-Known Member
#35
Automatic Monkey said:
There are different kinds of holecarding and some of them are overrated. The most efficient and reliable form of AP is abuse of promotions and comps.
Still trying to educate me eh? Still not interested in anything you have to say. Not looking for a fight and bygones be bygones and all that, but my opinions regarding your advice haven't changed.
As it stands i've made nearly 6 figures abusing promotions in the last year, so i'm quite aware of the value. I could have made that in far less hours with a quality hole card game, but that would require some skills that i'm not well versed in and a decent bankroll which i didn't have to begin with.

RJT.
 

Martin Gayle

Well-Known Member
#36
QFIT said:
That's exactly my point. Some people associate card counting with cheating because the casinos have pushed this association. If APs start associating peeking at an opponent's hand, almost universally associated with cheating by non-APs, the association between counting and cheating is reinforced. Rightly or wrongly. Perception is often more important than reality.
What? Who cares what a ploppy (non-APs) thinks of them? The law is the law and that is the reality that AP's, cheats, ploppies and casinos live in. Maybe computer programmers can live in a dream world where Perception rules and the rule of law is out the Doors. Counting and holecarding are both legal in the USA and most of the world as of this posting.

A ploppy doesn't know what an AP is but knows in general what cheating is and will cross contaminate the two. A plop doesn't need to know the difference and probably shouldn't really care.

Huxley pun intended.
 

QFIT

Well-Known Member
#37
Martin Gayle said:
What? Who cares what a ploppy (non-APs) thinks of them? The law is the law and that is the reality that AP's, cheats, ploppies and casinos live in. Maybe computer programmers can live in a dream world where Perception rules and the rule of law is out the Doors. Counting and holecarding are both legal in the USA and most of the world as of this posting.

A ploppy doesn't know what an AP is but knows in general what cheating is and will cross contaminate the two. A plop doesn't need to know the difference and probably shouldn't really care.

Huxley pun intended.
The law is what a jury says it is. Perception is reality. I live in the real world, not an ideal world. Does it matter? I think that it matters every time that a card-counter is back-roomed and goes to court to fight for his rights. If our image is that of a sleazy bunch of gamblers and cheats; why would a court or a jury sympathize with our perfectly legitimate claims?
 

Mimosine

Well-Known Member
#38
just read the article yesterday while smoking a cigar at a local cigar bar. didn't know such things existed in California of all places!

it's a good read. is it worth $6, i think so, i've re-read it 3 times already, it's only 3 short pages. There is nothing revealing in it, other than things we already know. With the exception that JG is attacking every game under the sun (claims to). Every game. Based on the article they describe attacking a new carnival game that is based on betting on getting two suited cards - and developing a count for it. No details mind you, but it wouldn't be hard to replicate the results for many people here. if this is true one might be able to attack the royal match side bet, whether or not this side bet is profitable with a specialized count is another story as the C.G. - JG article is about a carnival game with a much different pay scheme (from the sounds of it). Exact details were not given.
 
#39
Rjt

RJT said:
Flash - i don't post here very often these days and you've turned up since i stopped, but i have read a good number of your posts and this one i have to comment on.
Firstly,



why are you using the word "ALL" in capitals if you don't intend to at least imply that some of the advantages that Grosjean et al gain is through the fairly clear cut illegal method of spooking? Your implication with this post is clear for all to see so at least have the decensey to take ownership of the statements you make.
Posting a review of a book is one thing - and i know that ECAA is being discussed frequently at the moment - but we all get it, you think this book is overpriced and of little use. That's great, but the way you're going on about this is beginning to sound a little fanatical.
I agree that this book is of little use to the vast majority here. Gambling is an activity that has heavy investments of ego. Players - especially males - seem to think that they are proving themselves by winning and that losing is a loss of face. AP's by extension are worse. They already have themselves on a pedestal above the average player, as they've "mastered" a winning technique and this inflated ego in an already ego driven activity means that they have further to fall in admitting any weakness. Many exaggerate there success, skills or simply their experiences in the casino. Many live on the dream of what they could do - rather than the reality of what they will actually manage. For most people buying this book is simply a vicarious look into the life of someone who's actually doing something that they wish they were. And that's no sin. It provides a daydream away from the hum-drum of life. Escapism of you will. For a very small few here it will be more than that.
And the same is true about message boards discussing AP. For most of the people here, AP is a hobby. Something to make them feel a little special and it may even make them a little money, or at least remove the guilt that comes with the essentially enjoyable pass time of gambling. Very few people that are making really money from beating casinos post online regularly, simply due to the fact that those who are making the money are actually out making the money rather than reading and posting online. Certainly that's been my experience and my withdrawal for the online community coincided with starting to make a decent sum from AP.
As to ethics - there's little to discuss. We - none of us - operate in a particularly ethical business. The gambling industry has always been greedy and manipulative and has its roots in organised crime, even before Vegas became an entity.
Gambling is not an ethical or socially responsible practice. It risks money that could be constructively put to use elsewhere, but that's the nature of western society - we have so much that we have excess to sink into frivolous activities.
AP of any kind creates no viable products and provides no viable services so can't be construed in any way as a socially driven practice or morally righteous activity and it exists as a facet or consequence of an industry that is not ethical or socially responsible. That's not to say it is unethical to win at a competitive game - but making money solely by beating a weakness in a game can't be considered ethical either. You are not supporting or advancing the human race with this activity.
Off of ethics and back to the blood and guts of the issue
HC'ing is not done with reflective devices of any kind and the fact that you imply that HC'ers operate that way shows your ignorance of the topic. It involves finding a position whilst playing at a table, wherein a dealer's sloppy practice or a casino's sloppy procedure exposes information. That's there issue, not yours. Anyone who uses any kind of device to get that information has moved from being a HC to being a cheat and your continued implication that spooking and shining have anything to do with HC'ing is simply erroneous.
QFIT - i have to disagree with you regarding the information being available to everyone. To use a crass example, for bird spotters certain species are very rare and unusual and even if you are in the right location if you don't know what you are looking for, you may never see them. That doesn't mean that they are not there. Anyone who knows where to look will see them. The information is available to anyone who is prepared to think and take their time.
You presented an extreme example with someone hanging off their chair to see the card - in any real situation you wouldn't get away with that for long. I'm not going to claim that i'm an expert HC'er but i have played and will offer a counter example of the opposite extreme - last time i had a dealer exposing a hole card so blatantly that the entire table could see it - confirmed by 2 team mates sitting at the same table - but the other players didn't seem to pay any attention, so they were oblivious to their advantage. Just because they didn't know - or think - to look doesn't mean the information wasn't there for them. Even if the advantage is seat specific anyone who sits in that seat - AP or not - has the information available to them. HC'er simply train themselves to look for that advantage in the same way that counters train themselves to keep a ratio of high to low cards to identify their advantage.

RJT
I am all for HC play and I will do it in any fashion I can. As for "G" I say good for him, he is for sure thinking outside the box and I could give a hoot who his friends are. One of the most hated AP's in the BJ world I have found to be a great guy, away from public boards.

That being said I find your theorizing on the Psychology of posters or part time AP players most interesting.

Some of us find great fullfillment having a regular job, contributing to the community, running a business, filling peoples needs etc.,, and while doing that building up retirment accounts, SS, healthcare etc.

Some in order to *escape* from these sometimes overwhelming responsibilities
channel their drive, intellect and personalities into playing skilled BJ or VP on a part time, recreational scale. These type of personalities are winners in life and will not settle to become losers in their part-time profession. They simply have the best of both worlds...by design.

To infer that most of these type of players, that I refer to above, are less skilled or dedicated than a fulltimer, Pro, is erroneous to the extreme.

I have of course seen these type of debates come up in the past, many times and I have had my say, many times. Your post has just gone further in the negative and in it's depth and precision than any others I have seen.

RJT, I do enjoy your posts and make sure to real them all, even if you do post rarely. :)

My Best,
CP
 

RJT

Well-Known Member
#40
creeping panther said:
To infer that most of these type of players, that I refer to above, are less skilled or dedicated than a fulltimer, Pro, is erroneous to the extreme.

I have of course seen these type of debates come up in the past, many times and I have had my say, many times. Your post has just gone further in the negative and in it's depth and precision than any others I have seen.

RJT, I do enjoy your posts and make sure to real them all, even if you do post rarely. :)

My Best,
CP
Each to their own opinion - mine's is simple based on practicality (the full time pro has greater facility to hone their skills) and personal experience (my experience of the people i have spoken to online has shown that for the most part they vastly overblow their own practical skills - barring a few obvious exceptions that i don't need to name).
And whilst i may have sounded negative, i honestly don't have a problem with those people who play as a recreational activity - priorities are different. For me i find the challange of beating a game one of the most rewarding experiences i've had so i focus lengths of time that others couldn't validate on learning how to do so. That certainly doesn't make me right and them wrong. On the contrary, i'm well aware that my attitudes are far from the norm and perhaps a little unhealthy, but i've been that way about every aspect of my life.
Ultimately i just feel that certain techniques simply aren't mastered by the recreational player and to pursue the likes of tracking or HC'ing in any serious manner requires a dedication of time that the average card counter couldn't find to spare.
I could take a guess as to the AP you mentioned. I've always wondered what he's like in person.

RJT.
 
Top