aslan said:
I assume you achieve that greater frequency of aces by spreading to two or more hands when you believe an ace is coming?
No, I do my best sequenzing and bet only one spot, first place.
The problem is with 2 or 3 spots, if there sits an other person
you have no rights of decision. (spelling ?)
If there sits a counter or a perfect BS player you could bet 2 spots.
I like to bet only one spot because the small flux.
Sure the hourly win rate of betting 2 spots is bigger, I would never bet
3 spots, IMHO its nonsens or mental weakness.
There is no greater frequency of aces in percent to the bets
if you bet more spots,
example: betting 2 spots 13 times, you get usually 2 aces
when i am sequenzing I would get 6 aces in 26 big bets at 2 spots =8%
or 3 aces at 1 spot = 8%
Ok the hourly gain is bigger.
But I found out, when I bet only first base I get a bit more aces per spot, as if I bet 2 spots.
That means the first spot is the best in the long run.
The good news the flux are very very small.
If I mustn't care about money and would have a very big bankroll ,
I would bet the first 2 spots.
And there are the costs of the waiting bets, often I only sit at the table
and make no waiting bets, tell the dealer I have a bad streak and want to
wait.
If you bet only 1 spot, it often happens that you get no ace maybe
in 7 big bets, so you have a better camo than betting 2 spots.
Unfortunately for camo(fortunately for you) you hit the aces very often
and the old lady next to you cries "every time he bets big, he gets an ace"
you have a problem to explain , "pure luck, I had a good feeling,that's because I tip, 7th sense.
E.H.
I bet