sagefr0g said:
your approach brings to mind an interesting side issue. understanding the idea of Eliott Jacobson's " the blackjack zone" is i believe related to your thinking on your lifetime play test. doubtless such considerations are crucial. perhaps it's because i'm crossing over into the 'golden age zone' and have only just been playing blackjack for less than two years that i have an interest in and am prompted towards considering shorter term issues than the long term. i mean i believe even some one in my circumstance should base ones planning with respect to advantage play upon long term prospects however one such as myself naturally is going to be interested in ones shorter term prospects.
i suppose this is where mathematical approachs such as N0 would be of interest to guys in my circumstances.
additionally i find my self curious as to what degree advantage play yielding say about 1.5% advantage impacts short term prospects. i suppose standard deviation is what can help one gain some cognizance with regard to that issue. any one have any comments or thoughts regarding this?
best regards,
mr fr0g
i suppose this is where mathematical approachs such as N0 would be of interest to guys in my circumstances.
additionally i find my self curious as to what degree advantage play yielding say about 1.5% advantage impacts short term prospects. i suppose standard deviation is what can help one gain some cognizance with regard to that issue. any one have any comments or thoughts regarding this?
best regards,
mr fr0g