Hello all,
I'm currently looking at switching to an unbalanced count. Is there any MAJOR difference between an unbalanced count and lets say Hi-Lo (which I use now).
I'm a 6 deck shoe player, playing roughly 24 hours per week.
I've looked at this table here: http://www.qfit.com/card-counting.htm
Looking at the betting correlation column for shoe games, the unbalanced systems of:
KO, KISS 3, Red Seven, REKO, Unbalanced Zen 2, and Uston SS... they all have the same if not slightly .01 better than Hi-Lo.
The only problem I have with these unbalanced counts is that under the Ease of Play column, they are all listed very easy (10 being most easy) with the exception of the Uston SS.
Generally, (I think anyways) the more easy something is, the less effective it is.
I'm thinking of the Uston SS for this reason.
Let me know what you think, thanks
I'm currently looking at switching to an unbalanced count. Is there any MAJOR difference between an unbalanced count and lets say Hi-Lo (which I use now).
I'm a 6 deck shoe player, playing roughly 24 hours per week.
I've looked at this table here: http://www.qfit.com/card-counting.htm
Looking at the betting correlation column for shoe games, the unbalanced systems of:
KO, KISS 3, Red Seven, REKO, Unbalanced Zen 2, and Uston SS... they all have the same if not slightly .01 better than Hi-Lo.
The only problem I have with these unbalanced counts is that under the Ease of Play column, they are all listed very easy (10 being most easy) with the exception of the Uston SS.
Generally, (I think anyways) the more easy something is, the less effective it is.
I'm thinking of the Uston SS for this reason.
Let me know what you think, thanks