jack.jackson
Well-Known Member
After awhile, playing at the kitchen table with my girlfriend i noticed i wasnt getting double the results i was expecting. I experimented with this for about two months, and only saw about 50% increase in my win rate. Flux? Variation? Yes,no, I dont know? Though my results werent bad for 2, 1:10 [10u]spreads, 2D, sometimes spreading to four hands, sometimes all on two.
But after the weeks wore on i went from all high of about 25,000 back down to about 8,000. I was emotionally drained. Maybe i should of played one min, instead of two. 200 hrs/$40hr/ or 4 units between two people=2 units per hour.[approx.] When i can usually double this playing solo.Maybe i was making mistakes or maybe my time played's off.
Personally i think it was for two reasons. One,insufficient max bet's of hand each? Two, under betting my advantage due to spreading to 4 hands when the system is designed for two? Just not sure! The double action just didnt pan out the way i had hoped. So i went outside and sat down under nice shade tree to think about for awhile,
When out of nowhere an apple fell on my head. Then it hit me
Why couldnt one person be using a optimal playing strategy, while another person used a optimal betting strategy, for a mother of pearl of strategys. One controls the bets, the other controls the play of hands.
Is this feasibe? Would it yeild an acceptable difference? Could you devise such a system? Is there one already in existence? Anybody heard of such a two person system? Im curious to hear any feedback or thoughts that you might you have concerning this wild idea of a system:joker:
________________
But after the weeks wore on i went from all high of about 25,000 back down to about 8,000. I was emotionally drained. Maybe i should of played one min, instead of two. 200 hrs/$40hr/ or 4 units between two people=2 units per hour.[approx.] When i can usually double this playing solo.Maybe i was making mistakes or maybe my time played's off.
Personally i think it was for two reasons. One,insufficient max bet's of hand each? Two, under betting my advantage due to spreading to 4 hands when the system is designed for two? Just not sure! The double action just didnt pan out the way i had hoped. So i went outside and sat down under nice shade tree to think about for awhile,
When out of nowhere an apple fell on my head. Then it hit me Why couldnt one person be using a optimal playing strategy, while another person used a optimal betting strategy, for a mother of pearl of strategys. One controls the bets, the other controls the play of hands.
Is this feasibe? Would it yeild an acceptable difference? Could you devise such a system? Is there one already in existence? Anybody heard of such a two person system? Im curious to hear any feedback or thoughts that you might you have concerning this wild idea of a system:joker:
________________
