B BJLFS Well-Known Member Jan 23, 2011 #1 is $10 and you put out $5 for insurance. Say you lose the bet. My question is you haven't lost 50% but rather 33%? Couldn't you say that your total wager was $15 and you put out $5 of that? What say you?
is $10 and you put out $5 for insurance. Say you lose the bet. My question is you haven't lost 50% but rather 33%? Couldn't you say that your total wager was $15 and you put out $5 of that? What say you?
S Sucker Well-Known Member Jan 24, 2011 #2 If you bet $10 on the Packers and then you decided to bet $5 on the Jets; you made exactly TWO separate bets - and you lost 100% of your $5 wager.
If you bet $10 on the Packers and then you decided to bet $5 on the Jets; you made exactly TWO separate bets - and you lost 100% of your $5 wager.
B BJLFS Well-Known Member Jan 25, 2011 #3 But can't you say that the equivalent is a $15 bet and you are betting $5 of that for insurance? That's what I am trying to get at.
But can't you say that the equivalent is a $15 bet and you are betting $5 of that for insurance? That's what I am trying to get at.
N nybroker Member Jan 27, 2011 #4 BJLFS said: But can't you say that the equivalent is a $15 bet and you are betting $5 of that for insurance? That's what I am trying to get at. Click to expand... Say you take insurance, no BJ and then you lose the hand did you just loose 150%
BJLFS said: But can't you say that the equivalent is a $15 bet and you are betting $5 of that for insurance? That's what I am trying to get at. Click to expand... Say you take insurance, no BJ and then you lose the hand did you just loose 150%
B BJLFS Well-Known Member Jan 28, 2011 #5 nybroker said: Say you take insurance, no BJ and then you lose the hand did you just loose 150% Click to expand... No. Because you did not put the insurance bet out.
nybroker said: Say you take insurance, no BJ and then you lose the hand did you just loose 150% Click to expand... No. Because you did not put the insurance bet out.