Death of the counters' table!

aslan said:
So then you are saying that it is a complete mystery why all those APs left a winning game? Previously, you praised these same APs for having the discretion to not overspread, but now these same wise APs seemed to have failed to grasp the fact that the game is still eminently beatable.
Click to expand...

Initial disappointment is expected. But after a while, APs will realize it is still a good game, just not as good. And as I reported, the casino may put late surrender back to the table in the near future.
 
BJgenius007 said:
Initial disappointment is expected. But after a while, APs will realize it is still a good game, just not as good. And as I stated, the casino may put late surrender back to the table.

By the way, after I PMed you, did you fly here to play it once?
Click to expand...

My identity is top secret. Even I do not know who I am at times. View attachment 7842
 

Attachments

  • secret_agent.gif
    secret_agent.gif
    1.2 KB · Views: 363
BJgenius007 said:
You are absolutely right and will receive this year's Genius Award. :joker:

Actually I have spelled out the casino name in my early posts. After receiving many angry PMs, I have deleted them. But if you have photographic memory as many APs have, many of you would have no problem remembering it.
Click to expand...


I am just a ploppy AP hybrid who occasionally wins 5-10k at games like this.
 
Albee said:
BJ Genius, send me a message. I am positive this is a game I play once a month, but before I travel there I'd like to make sure.
Click to expand...

Genius described a 2D game with S17 and surrender. If this describes your game, how many of these do you think are in the world?
 
Thunder said:
I could have sworn I saw you on tv the other day. You have yellowish skin and haven't shaved in well forever. I could be wrong though.
Click to expand...

Don't tell me that you too have mixed my name ASLAN with ASIAN? View attachment 7843 Or is it the SMILEY FACE? :laugh: But, no, I am now clean-shaven, which has not always been to case.
View attachment 7844
 

Attachments

  • smiley-char013.gif
    smiley-char013.gif
    789 bytes · Views: 330
  • smiley-face-beard.jpg
    smiley-face-beard.jpg
    12.5 KB · Views: 324
BJgenius007 said:
Initial disappointment is expected. But after a while, APs will realize it is still a good game, just not as good. And as I reported, the casino may put late surrender back to the table in the near future.
Click to expand...

So...um...the casino realized that this game was being exploited (to the point where every player at the table was an AP as you previously said) and changed it so as to make it less exploitable. But they are now going to change it back?
 
Remember Remember said:
So...um...the casino realized that this game was being exploited (to the point where every player at the table was an AP as you previously said) and changed it so as to make it less exploitable. But they are now going to change it back?
Click to expand...

I quote the Genius:

BJgenius007 said:
If revenue goes down, the casino may cave in and bring back surrender in a few weeks. I encourage regular APs change their spread to 1-10 or 1-12 in next few weeks to make the change look bad in accounting.
Click to expand...
 
Remember Remember said:
So...um...the casino realized that this game was being exploited (to the point where every player at the table was an AP as you previously said) and changed it so as to make it less exploitable. But they are now going to change it back?
Click to expand...

The casino did not realize this game was being exploited. The removal of LS is store-wide. It is just a lucky guess for them. If casino finds out there is significant loss of patrons, LS will come back to all tables including the 2D.
 
If this is not a fictitious game the casino didn't use barring as their primary countermeasure. Either they were building a data base of APs to be sold to casinos around the country or their counter measure is to offer the best game to bring in customers but not APs. You say they only had 1 or 2 tables with this great game. They probably had a camera located to get a perfect photo for each seat. If it's to good to be true it probably is. Didn't you get suspicious when a great game came with a high tolerance for large bets/spreads? I hope you had a good disguise.
 
tthree said:
If this is not a fictitious game the casino didn't use barring as their primary countermeasure. Either they were building a data base of APs to be sold to casinos around the country or their counter measure is to offer the best game to bring in customers but not APs. You say they only had 1 or 2 tables with this great game. They probably had a camera located to get a perfect photo for each seat. If it's to good to be true it probably is. Didn't you get suspicious when a great game came with a high tolerance for large bets/spreads? I hope you had a good disguise.
Click to expand...

Did you forget, he's a genius!

(*whisper* Hey, don't give the casinos any ideas!)

But in reality, I don't think they would have given up the large amount of cash indicated by genius to put together a photo shoot that may or may not recoup their losses. But you do make good points: never let your guard down; be suspicious; if it's too good to be true, it probably is. To the last point, it didn't last. :cry:

Now, genius is working on shutting down the last vestige of goodness in that legendary game in XXXXXX Whoops, I almost said where it was! (as if everybody didn't already know) :grin::whip:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top