Semyon's seminar

lvhcm said:
Asshat, I've worked with five members of the BHOF, any one of them will vouch for me and my "understanding of the game". Who vouches for for you slick? Bojack? LMAO.
Click to expand...

Weren't you granted some webspace by a member of the BHOF to post this kind of stuff? Why must you post it on boards that actually have anything to do with blackjack?
 
I think Ken's stance on this one is completely fair and even handed. Everyone should be allowed the right to prove their worth and lvhcm has the opportunity.
He's attacked a lot of people that i - and just about everyone else here - considers very credible, he now has the chance to show that he is someone whose opinion should be considered.

RJT.
 
Question for Ken: While it may be inappropriate to disclose LVHCM's real identity,
can you identify one or more of his discussion board identities? zg
 
He gets the same level of privacy afforded anyone who posts here, which means any information I have on his identity is treated as confidential.
 
KenSmith said:
He gets the same level of privacy afforded anyone who posts here, which means any information I have on his identity is treated as confidential.
Click to expand...
OK, but if he doesn't rise to the challenge, I vote that he be permanently banned. And Stalker too. z:devil:g
Ps - Someone please post a poll referandum to detirmine if LVHCM should be permanently banned from BJINFO for lack of positive contribution - he illicitly uses A. Curtis's photo and his posts may be reviewed here -
(Dead link: http://www.blackjackinfo.com/bb/search.php?searchid=139682) _http://www.blackjackinfo.com/bb/member.php?u=1376_
 
Last edited:
Two cents

I dunno I think Ken does good job of moderating the site. It is my humble oppinion that he will get rid of himself. This site is not for everyone that plays the game just ones that find it usefull. I say let him find another site to disrupt. blackchipjim
 
I don't think people should be banned for lack of positive contribution. The only grounds I think someone should be banned is for actually taking away from the forums. By attacking users, bad language, spam, etc.

From all the posts I've seen of LVHCM, they have all been pretty negative. I don't know if they are bad enough to require banning, but that's not my decision.

I just wanted to post to say I don't think someone should get banned because they aren't adding anything of great value to the forum. They should only be banned if they are doing the forum damage.
 
zengrifter said:
OK, but if he doesn't rise to the challenge, I vote that he be permanently banned. And Stalker too. z:devil:g
Ps - Someone please post a poll referandum to detirmine if LVHCM should be permanently banned from BJINFO for lack of positive contribution - he illicitly uses A. Curtis's photo and his posts may be reviewed here -
(Dead link: http://www.blackjackinfo.com/bb/search.php?searchid=139682) _http://www.blackjackinfo.com/bb/member.php?u=1376_
Click to expand...
OK, I'll do it myself. zg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top