I got 2 more Aces![]()
I got 2 more Aces![]()
RSA is not very common in the joints I play (can only think of one place that allows)Thats awesome if you can re-split aces. If you are playing at a table that you can not resplit aces, your not finding the best place to play at.
Harrahs 10 years ago I am 3 rd base and playing 2 hands . I get a apir of aces on both hand and the dealer is showing a 6 . My bet was 1,000.00 a hand so I split and have $4,000.00 out . Firstace I get a 2 , second ace i get a 3 , 3rd ace I got a 4 and 4th ace I got a 5 . I am still not worried till the dick shows an ace with his 6 for 17 and I blew $K . What is the odds of that ? Oh well only time it happened .:grin:
:cool2:
Again table rules, double after split. Simple BS play but bad table rules.
Thats awesome if you can re-split aces. If you are playing at a table that you can not resplit aces, your not finding the best place to play at.
Thats awesome if you can re-split aces. If you are playing at a table that you can not resplit aces, your not finding the best place to play at.
Again table rules, double after split. Simple BS play but bad table rules.
RSA is a desirable rule, but only marginally so. LS is much more important, because the slope of it's value is much steeper as a function of count.
Would you say that there are many more opportunities to use LS than RSA?
Sure. In an 8D game you get to resplit aces 1 out of 2401 hands, and less with fewer numbers of decks. But with LS you'll be surrendering all the time, especially if you use all the surrender indices where you'll be doing it with some big bets down. Winning by losing!
If you get A,A for the first two cards and the count is even or high, I would play BS and split, BUT, if the count is real low, should you reconsider and not hit. You know you will probably get two low cards and be stuck with two stiffs that you can't hit again. Also, if you don't hit, at what point would the count need to be to just stay and die (or hope for luck)?