It's not my system. I found it here. I used info provided by the Wizard Of Odds in my analysis. That's been good enough for me and everyone else so far...until now I guess.
If you feel it's wrong, then PLEASE show me where.
Read the stickies before I made my post. I don't recall anyone ever asking an explanation of how a progression can clearly show a profit as this one does. Or show how the chart is wrong.
Step 1 is a repeat bet. To end the cycle requires 2 wins. So win $5 with the first bet. Repeat the bet with the $5 you won and win a total of $10. Progression starts a new cycle on step 1 again.
Step 2 is a parlay bet. To end the cycle also requires 2 wins. So win $5 with the first bet. Then...
Riddle me this, Batman...
Here’s a simple 6 step pos/neg progression I believe I found somewhere on this site.
It takes 2 wins (repeat or parlay) to reset the progression cycle to step 1. It also takes a single loss (parlay) or single NET loss (repeat) to advance to the next step.
...
You say "progressions lose in the long run", and predictability with counting comes to fruition in the long term not the short term.
That's where I think you guys have it wrong. It's like apples and oranges. You're using an orange to figure out if the apple is good or not.
Or which is...
Sorry. I'm not used to counter's jargon. The max and min I was talking about are the table max and min, not my bet variance. Of course, my bets are all within those limits.
All I'll say is if you play blackjack every day you're a far better man than me (or psychotic).
As for my income, I'll tell you I report one every year and I'm definately not rich. Other than that, I don't discuss it with anyone but my wife.
Lots of counters jumping on system players on this board. I've been playing for over 25 years and counting makes no sense to me.
If you're down to the last 100 cards in a 6 deck shoe the only thing that matters is the next 20 cards as that's all you're going to see. You can have a sky high...