Recent content by Zexika

Positive? :/

This one is really helpful. Drink is on me when I hit LL one day. :D

thank you. I found plenty for hilos, which I don't use. So, basically 10+1~2 for multideck on Zen count?

I remember seeing it somewhere a while ago for Zen count but I can't seem to google it now. Back then I used HiOpt II so I didn't pay attention to it but I do remember that at certain TC and higher Lucky Ladies is profitable bet. Vaguely I remember something like, don't bet for first half the...

I think I get it. I made some edits like coverplays, wong out@negative TC. Getting rid of LS alone puts it at negative. Thanks for replies :D

So that means nobody does :x figured maybe it'll make more EV overtime

Title says it. S17 LS NRSA game. For Zen count it shows I have 0.12% edge@ TC=0, what am I doing wrong here? O_O On the other hand, it doesn't do that to other counts. Even Hi Opt II ASC has negative edge on TC=0

Oh what I meant is, if you get stiff 10, vs dealer's 2 through 9, on just about any count you DD (unless you are playing severely negative counts). Does any one do the same with A9?

Anyone DD on A9 like they would on hard 10 regardless of the count? Wouldnt it generate more EV?

Oh, I thought those were off top of your head haha. Thanks ZG, as always!!

I18 vs full indices show 3-4% diff so does seem worth it in a way, but excluding TC+15 indices show about same result as full so yeah, you are right about very high TC indices makes virtually no difference.

Per deck. It's quite a headache haha. Wish I knew top 30 indices or so that really matters but I can't tell. I18 just isn't enough for satisfaction.

You mean CVData will "Make" indices? How do I do that?

I've memorized about 80 indices above TC>=-4. I've replaced/added indices from http://blackjackforumonline.com/content/Zen_Count_Indices.htm on CVCX, and result shows tiny bit less profit than HiOptII full indices with ASC and tiny bit less RoR. I'm glad I ditched HiOptII with ASC. I'm...

Thank you!!