CVCX question: Why does it show that I have slight edge at TC+0??

Zexika

Active Member
#1
Title says it. S17 LS NRSA game. For Zen count it shows I have 0.12% [email protected] TC=0, what am I doing wrong here? O_O

On the other hand, it doesn't do that to other counts. Even Hi Opt II ASC has negative edge on TC=0
 

BJgenius007

Well-Known Member
#3
Zexika said:
Title says it. S17 LS NRSA game. For Zen count it shows I have 0.12% [email protected] TC=0, what am I doing wrong here? O_O

On the other hand, it doesn't do that to other counts. Even Hi Opt II ASC has negative edge on TC=0
Because TC calculation is floored, you can have TC 0.9 floored to 0.
 

DSchles

Well-Known Member
#4
BJgenius007 said:
Because TC calculation is floored, you can have TC 0.9 floored to 0.
That would be true for all of the counts, not just Zen. So the question isn't answered. For example, Hi-Lo edge for the TC = 0 bucket is -0.27% for the rules indicated, so I would say there's something weird going on. Zen shouldn't be better than any other count at TC = 0.

Don
 

DSchles

Well-Known Member
#5
Zexika said:
Title says it. S17 LS NRSA game. For Zen count it shows I have 0.12% [email protected] TC=0, what am I doing wrong here? O_O

On the other hand, it doesn't do that to other counts. Even Hi Opt II ASC has negative edge on TC=0
Just looked at my CVCX, and it showed a -0.21% edge for Zen 4.5/6 decks, full indices, S17, DAS. Have no idea what you may be looking at. Screen shot, please.

Don
 
#8
Zexika said:
Title says it. S17 LS NRSA game. For Zen count it shows I have 0.12% [email protected] TC=0, what am I doing wrong here? O_O

On the other hand, it doesn't do that to other counts. Even Hi Opt II ASC has negative edge on TC=0
See, that's how strong Zen is!
DSchles said:
Zen shouldn't be better than any other count at TC = 0
Party pooper.
 
Last edited:
Top