CVCX question: Why does it show that I have slight edge at TC+0??

Z

Zexika

Active Member
Title says it. S17 LS NRSA game. For Zen count it shows I have 0.12% edge@ TC=0, what am I doing wrong here? O_O

On the other hand, it doesn't do that to other counts. Even Hi Opt II ASC has negative edge on TC=0
 
Zexika said:
Title says it. S17 LS NRSA game. For Zen count it shows I have 0.12% edge@ TC=0, what am I doing wrong here? O_O

On the other hand, it doesn't do that to other counts. Even Hi Opt II ASC has negative edge on TC=0
Click to expand...
Because TC calculation is floored, you can have TC 0.9 floored to 0.
 
BJgenius007 said:
Because TC calculation is floored, you can have TC 0.9 floored to 0.
Click to expand...

That would be true for all of the counts, not just Zen. So the question isn't answered. For example, Hi-Lo edge for the TC = 0 bucket is -0.27% for the rules indicated, so I would say there's something weird going on. Zen shouldn't be better than any other count at TC = 0.

Don
 
Zexika said:
Title says it. S17 LS NRSA game. For Zen count it shows I have 0.12% edge@ TC=0, what am I doing wrong here? O_O

On the other hand, it doesn't do that to other counts. Even Hi Opt II ASC has negative edge on TC=0
Click to expand...

Just looked at my CVCX, and it showed a -0.21% edge for Zen 4.5/6 decks, full indices, S17, DAS. Have no idea what you may be looking at. Screen shot, please.

Don
 
I think I get it. I made some edits like coverplays, wong out@negative TC. Getting rid of LS alone puts it at negative. Thanks for replies :D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top