Finn Dog
Well-Known Member
Greetings,
One of the arguments against sitting at 2nd base is the Wimbledon effect with respect to head movements.
To which some players have responded by freezing their heads and moving their eyes only--the only problem being the creation of an effect mimicking the eye movement of the infamous Kit Cat clock.
Which of these two is more of a red flag to the pit (I gotta think it's the Cat clock eyes)?
All of which is why other players have responded by learning to not move either their head or their eyes--but instead, to count with peripheral vision (seeming unconcerned with the other players' cards).
What do you when sitting at 2nd?
Finally, is it a good trade off to ignore all the other players' first and second cards and instead, just cancel their whole hand (when each player gets cards 3 and higher; only looking at their hand at that time)? Sure, you'll give up some information this way, but I'm thinking this is quite a Ploppie-like technique?
Best regards,
FD
One of the arguments against sitting at 2nd base is the Wimbledon effect with respect to head movements.
To which some players have responded by freezing their heads and moving their eyes only--the only problem being the creation of an effect mimicking the eye movement of the infamous Kit Cat clock.
Which of these two is more of a red flag to the pit (I gotta think it's the Cat clock eyes)?
All of which is why other players have responded by learning to not move either their head or their eyes--but instead, to count with peripheral vision (seeming unconcerned with the other players' cards).
What do you when sitting at 2nd?
Finally, is it a good trade off to ignore all the other players' first and second cards and instead, just cancel their whole hand (when each player gets cards 3 and higher; only looking at their hand at that time)? Sure, you'll give up some information this way, but I'm thinking this is quite a Ploppie-like technique?
Best regards,
FD
Last edited: