there is a problem with shuffle tracking, cutting, and betting large off the top, and that is how do you know your overcoming the house edge and then some? your going backwards by betting on the first hand, and then your going forwards by cutting out the tens, but where are you left at? i guess most of you play all anyways, so you dont care, but as for betting purposes then, how do you know? can you honestly memorize the ratio of picture to non picture (as i imagine you cant distinguish anything else it goes to fast) as all the cards go fluttering by in the riffle accurately enuf to know that you should place a large bet out? i dont know, i see this as something similar to fuzzy counting..
Preston said:
Is it bad that I had to look up what lammer meant?
All in all I know it's not a technique to fully depend on, but I have noticed my sessions where I did this my results were a little above average.
i looked in the dictionary and in wikipedia and couldnt find a definition for lammer.. i was thinking "laminated card" as in the cut card, but then i remembered the cut card is plastic, and also, why would you have it in your hand after you come back from wonging, and while he is shuffling, but you think of weird things when you dont know what something means
Automatic Monkey said:
As a chimpanzee, humans expect me to be oafish and comical in my behavior thus my borderline cheat moves look natural. Doing everything with a smile helps. And there's a difference between being drunk and appearing drunk.
A real cheat knows a lot more tricks. Did you know that simply hearing or reading the word "green" when looking at a red object will sometimes cause humans to see it as green?
Last edited by Sonny : October 29th, 2007 at 10:00 AM. Reason: Removed quote
im curious as to what the quote was