I'm guessing this was a typo, but just in case it wasn't, there are two different machines, a continuous shuffling machine (CSM) and an automatic shuffling machine (ASM).Meshounah said:will all casinos be using automatic shufflers?
Not more than normal as long as you dress and act the part. Remember that you'll probably be asked for your ID a lot, which will limit your anonymity.Meshounah said:Another question, would a college age kid attract heat off the top by playing $100 games? say your playing in the MGM or some other high profile casino.
Indices are basic strategy deviations based on the count. When the count is high, for example, you are expecting more high cards so you will stand and double down more often. They are explained in more detail in the Frequently Asked Questions thread.Meshounah said:I keep seeing references to Indices, what is that?
Sonny I have to part company with you here. The OP is right. CSM is going to dominate.Sonny said:That's what people were asking 4 years ago.I'm not worried about it. The machines just aren't worth the money. They speed up the game but they can be fairly unreliable. They break down, they jam and they damage the cards. Even when they work they are bad for business. It's a great idea but they have a long way to go before they are a practical device. And even then, it doesn't matter how well they work if nobody wants to play against them.
-Sonny-
I have to disagree with you, especially in areas where there are several casinos or more.Mr. T said:Sonny I have to part company with you here. The OP is right. CSM is going to dominate.
A liitle bit of history first. BJ was popularised and glamourisied by Ian Thrope, I probably got the spelling wrong, in AC in the 50's when he introduce card counting in the US. So it is a US original which has limited following outside the US.
Outside the US you will find that card counting is amost unheard of. CSM is already used in almost 100% of the BJ tables. The problems with the breakdown and jam cards that happened up to 1 year ago has more or less disappeared with the latest model that are presently in use.
Will the US follow the rest of the world. I would say that from a productivity stand point it will. They do much more rounds per hour, speed up the game and profit for the casino and is much less work for the dealers. But then there are guys like you and others who are always preaching against the CSM althouth it does not matter one bit if the player is not counting cards.
the other thing is the market place for casino games. there will likely always be a market for real blackjack. that being the case there will always likely be real blackjack.ihate17 said:I have to disagree with you, especially in areas where there are several casinos or more.
The player who plays horrible blackjack but plays green chips or higher is the key here for casino decisions. Today in Vegas you will find a total of zero CSM's in any high limit area and only will find a few on green chip tables at the busiest times. Compared to 6 or so years ago, the casinos have realized that as long as the customer has a choice he will reject these machines for hand shuffled or even ASM games. You are correct that it makes no difference to the non counter but as long as they believe it does they are in total control of what the casinos do.
Today you find CSM's on only the lowest of low rolling tables in Vegas and even at those California Indian casinos that have competition. Now if your casino is in an isolated area you can get away with them, but for now you would need all the owners of just about all the casinos in Vegas to get together and agree for what you see in the future happening.
I have also read that over the past several years there are less of them in use in Vegas. Do not know if this is true or not, but feel that more expensive, new, total table systems in the future, ones not as obvious as Mindplay would be a greater threat than CSM's.
ihate17
I have to disagree and side with Sonny, I live outside of the US (UK) and although there are many CSM's they only tend to be on the lowest limit tables, usally only £1-2 Mins ($2-4) once you get to £5min ($10) or above then they tend to be more hand shuffled games.Mr. T said:Sonny I have to part company with you here. The OP is right. CSM is going to dominate.
A liitle bit of history first. BJ was popularised and glamourisied by Ian Thrope, I probably got the spelling wrong, in AC in the 50's when he introduce card counting in the US. So it is a US original which has limited following outside the US.
Outside the US you will find that card counting is amost unheard of. CSM is already used in almost 100% of the BJ tables. The problems with the breakdown and jam cards that happened up to 1 year ago has more or less disappeared with the latest model that are presently in use.
Will the US follow the rest of the world. I would say that from a productivity stand point it will. They do much more rounds per hour, speed up the game and profit for the casino and is much less work for the dealers. But then there are guys like you and others who are always preaching against the CSM althouth it does not matter one bit if the player is not counting cards.