Betting Ramp for DD, input?

BMDD

Well-Known Member
2D H17 DOA nDAS 60%

TC1 2X10/10
TC2 2X15/20
TC3 2X20/30
TC4 2X30/45
TC5 2X40/60
TC6 2X50/75
TC7 2X50/75 +5LL
TC8 2X50/75 +10LL
>TC8 2X50/75 +20LL

Pretty standard double deck game w/ lucky ladies, I play 2 hands of 10 off the top as you may not spread to 2 hand mid-shoe.
I've listed my spread for 1 hand and for 2. At TC -2 I drop to one hand of $5 or $10, though I sometimes drop to one hand at 0/-1 If there are only a round or two left before the shuffle.

The lucky ladies payouts are the double deck ones (4/10/25/200/1000)
Should I be more aggressive in super high counts with lucky ladies?

Any input would be much appreciated. Also, if anyone could give me a ROR estimate for a $6000 BR it would be appreciated.
 
Last edited:

FLASH1296

Well-Known Member
This is NOT a standard DD game.

In most places, Las Vegas included, a DD game will have EITHER S17 or DAS.

The House Edge on this game makes it unplayable (to me) unless I am getting > 70% penetration at the least.
 

BMDD

Well-Known Member
I stand corrected, but this is about as good as it gets where I'm at currently. Figure it's still a pretty beatable game with a heavy spread, $5-2X$50 (1-20).

Though perhaps I'm better off playing the 6 deck games that allow DAS and MSE.
 

FLASH1296

Well-Known Member
Wow.

If they will let you spread that wide then the game is very profitable indeed.

The shoe game - unless it has Late Surrender and S17 with 85% penetration is unlikely to be anywhere near as beatable.
 

daddybo

Well-Known Member
BMDD said:
I stand corrected, but this is about as good as it gets where I'm at currently. Figure it's still a pretty beatable game with a heavy spread, $5-2X$50 (1-20).

Though perhaps I'm better off playing the 6 deck games that allow DAS and MSE.
Search for a thread on the Lucky Ladies sidebet.. I've never seen it in a DD game... I'm thinking a DD game would have a higher house edge than a 6d game in regards to the LL bet.
 

BMDD

Well-Known Member
The improved pay table for the double deck game makes for a very slightly lower house edge than the 6 deck game(found on galaxy gaming's website). Of course, it is still an absolute joke of a side bet for a non-counter. I have seen the multiple LL threads, including the analysis of lucky ladies report, but most of the info I could find was for the 6 deck game.

Flash, there are certain PC's that I tend to avoid, but in general I can spread as wide as I'd like. Especially if kept below $100 (cheques play)
 

FLASH1296

Well-Known Member
As a Pro player I know that "time is money"

Side Bets like "Lucky Ladies" are a big "negative",
because they serve to slow down the pace of the game.

Less hands per hour equates with reduced earnings.
 
Top