hello everybody
I have changed my posts title to
First Three Cards Analysis (F.T.C.A.)followed by a number. I think is the best title I can give to my posts because this is what is, after all.
Some thing went wrong (my fault) with my numbering. Let' all agree that this post is F.T.C.A N°5
The "A." in F.T.C.A. could as well mean
-approach
-analyst
-analysis
I left you with a question in my last post.
You get 9-8 the dealer gets 2
what do you think etc......
Those who really want to install an "VISUAL IMAGE" of the "F.T.C.A Approach" in their brain should , at least "ONCE" do any my exercice with real cards. I do not intend insulting your intelligence, but doing it is like taking a photograph of what I mean.
do this with real cards
-Put the "9" card under your riight hand
-Give yhe dealer a "2" in front of you
-Put the "8" card under your left hand
17 against 2 is the first situation you see
Now
Let's say that the "9" card is under your left hand and the "8" card under your right hand
-move the card under your left hand next to the dealer's one
-move the card under your right hand under your left hand
-move the dealer's card under your right hand
10 against 9. Double Down. We love D.D.'s, don't we
-move the card under your left hand next to the dealer's one
-move the card under your right hand under your left hand
-move the dealer's card under your right hand
11 against 8. D.D. once again
I presented my question giving you "9-8" against "2" to intentionnaly hide two D.D. included in the ticket
17 against 2 is a losing(slighly) situation
if if ou analyse the full ticket 9-8-2 this ends up being a winning ticket
By the way, a C.C. will see two "HIGH VALUE" card ans one "LOW VALUE" card. the C.C guy see's 17 against 2 only and he probably knows that this this is a slighly losing situation. He is not consistent with himself, because he should see a winning ticket
The F.T.C.A. is consistent with himself seing a winner in 17 against 2 because the F.T.C.A sees the two hidden D.D.'s that the C.C. doesn't look at.
the F.T.C.A. will lower is next bet and "FULLY" agrees with himself doing it. The F.T.C.A is happy with that tickets; all ticket that will decrease you next bet are good news, don't we agree.? And this is "TRUE" whatever "APPROACH" you are using. C.C. ("card counting" for those who haven't read my previous posts) being just "ANOTHER ONE". F.T.C.A is just "ANOTHER ONE" after all.
Some of you already guess that there are tickets with only "ONE" hidden OR Actual" Double Down situation example "9-7-2" and there are no tickets with "three" hidden D.D.s situation because in that case the ticket is a D.D however the cards will land on the table. "6-5-4", "6-5-5", "5-5-5" are some of them.
Let me give a clear message to the L.C.C.C. (Last Century Card Counters)
I started (20 year's ago) to think that I could beat the roulette. Needless to tell you that I lost my time.
The roulette players have this problem. trust me that I know what I'm talking about.
player is betting RED but for a period of time (15-20 minute in a land-based casino) the roulette ends up with "BLACK" numbers.
after 1-2-... 5-....7- 10-15-16-17 "BLACK" numbers coming in a row the roulette players goes
"GOD DAMNED, that bloody roulette has got to give me a "RED" number
AND HE IS WRONG because the are no previous number to take account of. every single spin doesn't have memory. it's independant, you all know that.
the BlackJack C.C. "PIONNEERS realized that a shoe of card has some sort of memory as it goes on. and I congratulate and admire them"
To those of C.C guys who still pay in land-based casinos, I agree that you have "ONE APPROCH" to vary your bets and move the table final edge to your advantage. It is proved and I don't disagree with you.
I mentionned a few advantages of the F.T.C.A vs C.C. in my previous posts and there are a few. just the fact that counting card is 'ILLEGAL" should be enough for you to swith you're way of looking at blackjack if proposed a "legal approach". I'm wrong?
Those who play the "C.C. APPROACH" playing blackjack "ONLINE-CASINOS" Have become "ROULETTE PLAYERS". there is no memory in your shoe any more
Out of all my statements this is the most important, "WHEThER THEY LIKE IT OR NOT" they've become roulette players of new type. GAMBLERS PLAYING ROULETTE, THINKING THEY ARE PLAYINg BLACKJACK.
in short and I finish with this posts here
counting cards is illegal in landbased casinos
counting cards is "USELESS" at online casinos
do yourself a favour. Let your brain cross that "BORDER" once for all.
best regards
ben
I have changed my posts title to
First Three Cards Analysis (F.T.C.A.)followed by a number. I think is the best title I can give to my posts because this is what is, after all.
Some thing went wrong (my fault) with my numbering. Let' all agree that this post is F.T.C.A N°5
The "A." in F.T.C.A. could as well mean
-approach
-analyst
-analysis
I left you with a question in my last post.
You get 9-8 the dealer gets 2
what do you think etc......
Those who really want to install an "VISUAL IMAGE" of the "F.T.C.A Approach" in their brain should , at least "ONCE" do any my exercice with real cards. I do not intend insulting your intelligence, but doing it is like taking a photograph of what I mean.
do this with real cards
-Put the "9" card under your riight hand
-Give yhe dealer a "2" in front of you
-Put the "8" card under your left hand
17 against 2 is the first situation you see
Now
Let's say that the "9" card is under your left hand and the "8" card under your right hand
-move the card under your left hand next to the dealer's one
-move the card under your right hand under your left hand
-move the dealer's card under your right hand
10 against 9. Double Down. We love D.D.'s, don't we
-move the card under your left hand next to the dealer's one
-move the card under your right hand under your left hand
-move the dealer's card under your right hand
11 against 8. D.D. once again
I presented my question giving you "9-8" against "2" to intentionnaly hide two D.D. included in the ticket
17 against 2 is a losing(slighly) situation
if if ou analyse the full ticket 9-8-2 this ends up being a winning ticket
By the way, a C.C. will see two "HIGH VALUE" card ans one "LOW VALUE" card. the C.C guy see's 17 against 2 only and he probably knows that this this is a slighly losing situation. He is not consistent with himself, because he should see a winning ticket
The F.T.C.A. is consistent with himself seing a winner in 17 against 2 because the F.T.C.A sees the two hidden D.D.'s that the C.C. doesn't look at.
the F.T.C.A. will lower is next bet and "FULLY" agrees with himself doing it. The F.T.C.A is happy with that tickets; all ticket that will decrease you next bet are good news, don't we agree.? And this is "TRUE" whatever "APPROACH" you are using. C.C. ("card counting" for those who haven't read my previous posts) being just "ANOTHER ONE". F.T.C.A is just "ANOTHER ONE" after all.
Some of you already guess that there are tickets with only "ONE" hidden OR Actual" Double Down situation example "9-7-2" and there are no tickets with "three" hidden D.D.s situation because in that case the ticket is a D.D however the cards will land on the table. "6-5-4", "6-5-5", "5-5-5" are some of them.
Let me give a clear message to the L.C.C.C. (Last Century Card Counters)
I started (20 year's ago) to think that I could beat the roulette. Needless to tell you that I lost my time.
The roulette players have this problem. trust me that I know what I'm talking about.
player is betting RED but for a period of time (15-20 minute in a land-based casino) the roulette ends up with "BLACK" numbers.
after 1-2-... 5-....7- 10-15-16-17 "BLACK" numbers coming in a row the roulette players goes
"GOD DAMNED, that bloody roulette has got to give me a "RED" number
AND HE IS WRONG because the are no previous number to take account of. every single spin doesn't have memory. it's independant, you all know that.
the BlackJack C.C. "PIONNEERS realized that a shoe of card has some sort of memory as it goes on. and I congratulate and admire them"
To those of C.C guys who still pay in land-based casinos, I agree that you have "ONE APPROCH" to vary your bets and move the table final edge to your advantage. It is proved and I don't disagree with you.
I mentionned a few advantages of the F.T.C.A vs C.C. in my previous posts and there are a few. just the fact that counting card is 'ILLEGAL" should be enough for you to swith you're way of looking at blackjack if proposed a "legal approach". I'm wrong?
Those who play the "C.C. APPROACH" playing blackjack "ONLINE-CASINOS" Have become "ROULETTE PLAYERS". there is no memory in your shoe any more
Out of all my statements this is the most important, "WHEThER THEY LIKE IT OR NOT" they've become roulette players of new type. GAMBLERS PLAYING ROULETTE, THINKING THEY ARE PLAYINg BLACKJACK.
in short and I finish with this posts here
counting cards is illegal in landbased casinos
counting cards is "USELESS" at online casinos
do yourself a favour. Let your brain cross that "BORDER" once for all.
best regards
ben
