I think the difference between HO2 and RPC are tags for aces, 3's, and 6's.
Today I was trying to see if I could keep 2 seperate counts.
Using HighOptII for PE and using a second count for BC that only changes when aces 3's and 6's are dealt. Adding the 2 counts together becomes the RPC.
Has anyone ever tried anything like else?
Today I was trying to see if I could keep 2 seperate counts.
Using HighOptII for PE and using a second count for BC that only changes when aces 3's and 6's are dealt. Adding the 2 counts together becomes the RPC.
Has anyone ever tried anything like else?
I simmed this exact situation once years back. The results were indeed impressive. But, I'd never actually try it. in a casino.
I just found out that HighOptII side counts the 8's & 9's... hmm.. this is tough keeping a secondary count as well..
Use the ho2, betting strategy, for both(added) counts. You can also use, the RPC indices, for certain hands, such as splitting XXs. These act like ace params, but since RPC already reckons the ace, use the RPC indices, when you add the two counts together. In general you will use ho2 for stiffs and the RPC, for most other hands.
I use a secondary of A/3/5 w/ao2, to create wong halves. Unfortunately, unlike yours, my fives have two different values, so its slightly tougher than your secondary. Meaning you count the 3and6 for +1 in both counts.
Using the most common rules with S17/H17 and pitch/shoe games ..what kind of EV does the AoII and wong halves combined equate too ?