10-10 v 14, 12 v 10-9
Brock Windsor said:
Still even without the sims for proof I'd like to hear a few qualified opinions from some of the forums more knowledgeable members (RJT, Sonny, etc.) even if we can't get a sim I think a few people here will have some valuable instincts that will be close. Lets brainstorm how folks would play the following hands in a Spanish 21 game. S17, 8deck, usual rules (double on any number of cards, no redoubling)
A2 vs 12 (Hit or Double?)
8 vs 12 (Hit or Double?)
12 vs 19 (Hit or surrender?)
20 vs 14 (Stand or Split?)
Right now when I play the above hands I: Double, Double, Hit, and Stand. The removal of 10's and double on any number of cards really changes the hole card strategy on this game I think. Sometimes I even hit 12vs12 as I think it is a close play. Lets post some thoughts!
BW
I think I can help you out with 10-10 v hard 14 and hard 12 v hard 19
6 decks, pre deal deck comp (2 through ace) 24,24,24,24,24,24,24,24,72,24
10-10 v 10-4 split: 66.43%, stand:70.20%
10-10 v 9-5 split: 66.73%, stand:70.27%
10-10 v 8-6 split: 67.00%, stand:70.58%
10-10 v 7-7 split: 68.54%, stand:71.58%
10-2 v 10-9 hit: -32.41%, surrender: -50%
9-3 v 10-9 hit: -33.16%, surrender: -50%
8-4 v 10-9 hit: -33.16%, surrender: -50%
7-5 v 10-9 hit: -32.84%, surrender: -50%
6-6 v 10-9 hit: -32.64%, surrender -50%
It is correct to double A-2 v hard 12 when doubling is allowed on 2 cards. I'm not sure when doubling is allowed on any number of cards.
It is not correct to double a 2 card hard 8 v hard 12.
My comp dependent program can compute doubling on any number of cards but it can only deal with dealer up cards. My new program can compute dealer hands whether hard, soft, or up card but it cannot compute doubling on any number of cards at this time.
k_c