Funny stuff lol.
Worrying about 0.04% difference lol.
To put it in perspective, even I wouldn't worry about which is "right" lol.
Think about that one lol.
Watch out though, Goalposter may come back to you guys after playing 1,000,000 $5 hands and, after being behind $27,000, ask whether he is $1,000 above or below EV.
Then he'll ask, was your Basic Strategy calc, comp or total dependent.
Then he'll ask was that using a cut-card or not lol?
Then he'll ask whether or not either of you were assuming the recommended Basic Strategy changes to realize the essentially meaningless advantage of a 7-card Charlie in the first place lmao.
Then he'll likely guess that both are probably only very reasonable guesses after all, and, in his pursuit of absolute truth lol, ask QFIT if his software could likely handle such a question and possibly generate any deviations from BS as necessary.
Then QFIT will probably say his software can handle the rules but maybe not the BS changes of like maybe hitting a 5-card 12 vs 4 becasue you may have a chance at that 7-card automatic winner.
Then he'll figure knowing the "exact" answer, or as an "exact" answer as the software could give him, decide the software wouldn't pay for itself in the next 50,000 hands anyway lol.
Then he'll just say to himself "screw it", get conservative and assume worst case, subtract a little for re-spliiting Aces, ignore the 7-card Charlie, and let the 7's stuff fall where it may or, maybe even assume these guys probably have half a clue and I'll just go with 0.54% lol.
Then we'll all just ask him why he seems to care so much more about the rate at which he will lose money than the broader truth, perhaps, he is doomed to lose a little money either way lol.