hows the SD at mandalay bay?
- Thread starter jingber05
- Start date
zengrifter
Banned
You just answered your own question.jingber05 said:
Why play a 1D game with 4x higher house edge than the 6D game next to it.
Tell us what you were thinking when you asked this? zg
StudiodeKadent
Well-Known Member
Indeed. 6:5 is a hideous evil.
The idea that you "need" 6:5 to have a profitable single deck game is stupid.
A single deck game with NS, D10-11, nRSA, DAS and splitting up to 4 hands has a house edge of 0.46% (0.58% if nDAS).
Offerring this game at 10/15 dollars (and the nDAS version at 5/10 dollars) would easily be profitable for a casino. Hell, you could probably offer the DAS version at 5/10 if you automatically reshuffled the deck.
Thus, 6:5 is NOT necessary for casinos to make money off of single deck blackjack. This is simply a lie which the casinos tell to hide the truth; 6:5 is a sucker game for stupid people.
Every time someone plays a 6:5 game they contribute to the destruction of good blackjack games.
The idea that you "need" 6:5 to have a profitable single deck game is stupid.
A single deck game with NS, D10-11, nRSA, DAS and splitting up to 4 hands has a house edge of 0.46% (0.58% if nDAS).
Offerring this game at 10/15 dollars (and the nDAS version at 5/10 dollars) would easily be profitable for a casino. Hell, you could probably offer the DAS version at 5/10 if you automatically reshuffled the deck.
Thus, 6:5 is NOT necessary for casinos to make money off of single deck blackjack. This is simply a lie which the casinos tell to hide the truth; 6:5 is a sucker game for stupid people.
Every time someone plays a 6:5 game they contribute to the destruction of good blackjack games.
paddywhack
Well-Known Member
Yep, but they're doing it day in and day out everywhere.StudiodeKadent said:
You just can't seem to teach these ploppies anything about house edge and what kind of a disadvantage they're playing at.
Which is why, for the most part, I believe that H17 will become the norm for nearly everywhere on all games, SD, DD, 6D, and 8D. The house gets a higher edge and no one will care one iota.
StudiodeKadent
Well-Known Member
I think there are SOME reasons to be optimistic... for one, higher knowledge of gaming is correlated with larger bankrolls so a casino will still have to be reasonable with edges at higher limits.paddywhack said:Yep, but they're doing it day in and day out everywhere.
You just can't seem to teach these ploppies anything about house edge and what kind of a disadvantage they're playing at.
Which is why, for the most part, I believe that H17 will become the norm for nearly everywhere on all games, SD, DD, 6D, and 8D. The house gets a higher edge and no one will care one iota.
For two, at least with the internet, good strategy information is more easily accessible for free.
I think part of the solution is for blackjack players to virally promote casinos that have better rules and state WHY these rules are better (I do so all the time). I also think that it would make sense for APs to be less aggressive at casinos with good rules; casinos that offer a good game should make profits from doing so.
I think his point is if you dont play at the casinos with bad rules you can be less aggressive at the casinos with good rules. Personally I dont play where there is bad rules and play as aggressively as I can get away with where there are good rules.Shoofly said:
Its like driving on the highway. Nobody drives the speed limit making it dangerous to do so. But if you are among the fastest on the road you are going to get pulled over by the authorities. Let enough people drive faster than you, you can drive way over the speed limit with little chance of unwanted attention from the authorities.
im going to be in vegas this coming sunday and ill be staying at the mandalay. i don't think they have 8D anymore but does anyone suggest I play their DD over their SD? The DD is $25 min. and the SD is 10. I mean 10 isnt alot for a 1k+ bankroll for the trip. What do you guys think? stick to the DD?
StudiodeKadent
Well-Known Member
The logic here is that a casino deserves to get some reward for offerring good games. If AP's play frequently and aggressively at a casino offerring better games, said casino will toughen up the rules.Shoofly said:
StudiodeKadent
Well-Known Member
I was talking about virally marketing the best games to non-APs. That way, ploppies get better educated about how to play blackjack well and the casino gets more customers that aren't APs thus making more profit.Sharky said:
The idea is to educate the gaming public to search for better games in order to create an incentive for casinos to keep house edges down.
paddywhack
Well-Known Member
paddywhack said:Which is why, for the most part, I believe that H17 will become the norm for nearly everywhere on all games, SD, DD, 6D, and 8D. The house gets a higher edge and no one will care one iota.
I actually think you're giving the ploppies WAY too much credit here. Nearly all have only a very rudimentary knowledge of basic strategy. Researching how H17 makes a poorer game than S17, ha, that'll happen.StudiodeKadent said:
What are ploppies thinking?
One of the things that amazed me about ploppies is the way they hit 16 v T without hesitation but think forever about hitting 16 v 7 or in many cases even against a 5 or 6. Even if you are ignorant of how to play blackjack, it should be obvious that you need the dealer to bust most of the time to win 16 v T but it is less likely than for any other dealer upcard except an ace. You are in the same situation with 16 v stiff but a dealer bust is much more likely. Dont they notice the deck contains 4 times as many ten value cards as any other card value?
One of the things that amazed me about ploppies is the way they hit 16 v T without hesitation but think forever about hitting 16 v 7 or in many cases even against a 5 or 6. Even if you are ignorant of how to play blackjack, it should be obvious that you need the dealer to bust most of the time to win 16 v T but it is less likely than for any other dealer upcard except an ace. You are in the same situation with 16 v stiff but a dealer bust is much more likely. Dont they notice the deck contains 4 times as many ten value cards as any other card value?
Mandalay Bay usually has a 6 deck game with S17, LS, and RSA for a house edge of .28% and I've seen it at $10 minimums. I haven't been there in a few months so I can't speak to the current conditions. I can verify that MGM had the same game last week at $10 minimums with 75% penetration.Sharky said:
StudiodeKadent
Well-Known Member
Yes! YES! YEAH! MORE!!!paymypush said:
Honestly, thanks for this. Now I know Vegas still has liberal rules BJ at below the black chip level.
Thanks for telling me this. Really. The "S17 almost gone" thread had me in a panic.