I don't agree with the ruling, and I'm not taking sides with the casino. I also don't need a lecture on the greed and logical fallacies of casino operations and tactics. it is just the way things are, and it is the cat and mouse game we play. Not to sound like an old fuddy duddy, but I am afraid of how much change would happen if casinos were not given the right to refuse service, less civil rights infringement. As always, casinos would overreact to the situation and quite possibly CSMs and half cut shoes could be the industry standard.
Let's be honest. A casino is a business. It is a capitalist american's idealistic beauty. It is excessive, and is fed by america's love for vices and addictions. Tobacco, liquor, oil, porn, and pharmaceutical industries have all succeeded in america based on this principle. during this success, they have won the hearts, minds and pockets of politicians, and even local economies. For they provide jobs, and support Business to business economies with the services they need. they pay taxes, and I'm sure they bribe politicians. Now with all that at stake, who do you think is going to win a court case, the lowly scavenger counter, or the "respected" casino?
in regards to AC, I hate shoes. I'd rather have SD and DD games while risk getting banned, than have only shoes and not get banned. maybe I'm a little twisted in that I enjoy fighting for my fast money. I enjoy making PCs and dealers upset when I kill their SD and DD games. If I haven't been banned, I enjoy upsetting them, while they're forced to serve me as I take their money, and give me comps at the same time.