I found a game at a remote store that is a unique variation on BJ, I think it was called triple action or something like that. There are 3 bets you can make, a BJ bet, a poker bet, and a casino war type bet based on the first card vs the dealer upcard. Surely the poker bet is a sucker bet, and it is optional. You have to make equal bets on the BJ bet and the war bet.
If the war bet ties, you lose half of your bet.
It is single deck, BJ pays 3:2, not sure about restrictions on splits or doubles or if those are even allowed... seems like based on these factors it could be a decent game. You do have the disadvantage of having to place the high card bet. Am I correct in assuming that the disadvantage for this is fixed?
How much of a disadvantage is this high card bet anyway? Also for this bet having only one deck likely is favorable, slightly fewer ties.\, I would think.
If the war bet ties, you lose half of your bet.
It is single deck, BJ pays 3:2, not sure about restrictions on splits or doubles or if those are even allowed... seems like based on these factors it could be a decent game. You do have the disadvantage of having to place the high card bet. Am I correct in assuming that the disadvantage for this is fixed?
How much of a disadvantage is this high card bet anyway? Also for this bet having only one deck likely is favorable, slightly fewer ties.\, I would think.