blackjack avenger said:
Does one consider an all time high mid session or end of session? The issue would also be different for a resizer vs a fixed bettor.
Hey BA - how you've been?
All I was trying to say was what I thought Griffin meant when he said it.
That it only has to do with with the percentage of playing one's present hand at an all-time bankroll high compared to the percentage of all hands played that were at a point less than all-time roll high since the most recent point when an all-time had been achieved.
That, the way I understood it, which don't make it right lol, was that it had absolutely nothing to do with "sessions" per se.
If so, maybe it was to just make the general point one spends alot of time playing with a current roll that is less than one's previous all-time high roll.
I doubt if anyone actually would go to the trouble of measuring that which does make me wonder if I understood his point correctly in the first place lol.
I think, but don't know, whatever assumptions he may have been assuming when he said that, were probably based on betting the same way with no re-sizing. In other words I'm guessing at a point of re-sizing one would compare one's roll from that point forward with that re-sized bet and from that point forward his 1.5-2% statement would apply from that point forward since circumstances have changed.
It's easy enough to figure out the chances of having a "winning" session compared to roll at beginning of "session", such chances obviously increasing as "session" length (I'd much prefer number of rounds played) increases. Comparing that to an "all-time" high roll is way, way beyond me lol.
I really wouldn't give a crap about how many individual hands I had played at an "all-time-high" anyway. Like somebody said, it's stupid to worry about it in the first place , to me. I'd be completely happy reasonably knowing the liklelyhood of where my current results stand and could care less, as has maybe happened, that I may have achieved playing 100 hands at an "all-time high" at the beginning but 5000 hands later am down 3 SD's overall apparently proving how I understand his statement since I have actually played 2% of my total hands at an "all-time" high at that point lmao.
I won't care how many hands were played at an all-time high after I've quadrupled my orig roll and have a very high chance of having reached The Promised Land wherein life is sunshine and lollipops and roses (Leslie Gore song - that's how pathetic I am lmao) and I will win money forever.