Omeaga II

#1
how much better mathmaticly is it then hi-lo? how much extra advantage does a side count of aces add? in your opion is it worth the extra difficultity? does anyone here use it?
 
#2
kid blackjack said:
how much better mathmaticly is it then hi-lo? how much extra advantage does a side count of aces add? in your opion is it worth the extra difficultity? does anyone here use it?
Its an antiquated count, due to the necessity of keeping and converting a side Ace-count for accurate betting. ZEN is preferred for this reason (no Ace side-count -

Tags comparison 2-A
HO2: 112211/00/-20
ZEN: 112221/00/-2-1

-------------
THE "BEST" CARD COUNTING SYSTEM
By Arnold Snyder
(From Blackjack Forum Volume I #3, September 1981)
© Blackjack Forum 1981

A number of blackjack players have written me asking my opinion of the "best" card counting system. This is a loaded question. As I mentioned in Blackjack Forum #I I have been using the Hi-Opt II count, because I like its power and simplicity for my ability and style of play.
HERE - http://www.blackjackforumonline.com/content/hundred.htm
 
Last edited:

Sonny

Well-Known Member
#3
It can work in pitch games, but it begins to break down in shoe games. As ZG said, the extra effort is just not worth it. Any tiny advantage that it might give you will probably be lost due to mistakes.

-Sonny-
 
Top