Why not play a $10 table?
Bit puzzled. If your spread is 1-8, isn't 8 units at TC+4+ = $200 ?
Have you calculated your +EV, $$$s wise? I ask, as 1-8 spread on our games here in the UK will just about break even. It should be better on the ruleset you've detailed, but I'd be interested to know by how much (the no hole card rule in the UK and Europe adds 0.11% to the HE).
Well, I can't bet $20 as it's below the table minimum. So I'd have to increase the $20 bet to $25. AND I WOULD ALSO DECREASE THE MAX BET TO $150.
Will this have a SIGNIFICANT affect on my strategy and RoR?
Bit puzzled. If your spread is 1-8, isn't 8 units at TC+4+ = $200 ?
Have you calculated your +EV, $$$s wise? I ask, as 1-8 spread on our games here in the UK will just about break even. It should be better on the ruleset you've detailed, but I'd be interested to know by how much (the no hole card rule in the UK and Europe adds 0.11% to the HE).
OK, let me ask one simple question:
What bankroll must I have to bet a spread of 1 to 8 in the game with the rules noted above to maintain about a 13.5% RoR OR LESS? I will play until bankroll is gone or I double it.
Spread will be as follows....
TC less than 1 = $25
TC 1 = $50
TC 2 = $100
TC 3 = $150
TC 4 = $200
I WOULD REALLY APPRECIATE IT IF YOU WOULD CONFINE YOUR RESPONSE TO THE SCOPE OF MY QUESTION
Don S. indicates in the same chart that the risk of ruin should be around 13.50% with a NO of 20,000 hands...this is acceptable to me. My question is first...are these numbers accurate? Second, what this means to me is that with my $10K bankroll I will have a 13.5% chance of losing it all before doubling my bankroll and an 86.5% chance of doubling my bankroll assuming I play until I reach one or the other. Is this correct?
The $200 bet at TC 4 is for the 1 to 16 spread
OK, let me ask one simple question:
What bankroll must I have to bet a spread of 1 to 8 in the game with the rules noted above to maintain about a 13.5% RoR OR LESS? I will play until bankroll is gone or I double it.
Spread will be as follows....
TC less than 1 = $25
TC 1 = $50
TC 2 = $100
TC 3 = $150
TC 4 = $200
With an 8-1 spread you will not live long enough to rationally
expect to double your bankroll, even if you are < 1 year old.
Your spread should be 16-1. 8-1 will NOT cut it.
Without crunching the numbers, I'm going to hazard a guess ... (presuming you live >300 years),
that your 8-1 spread will require your (green chip) bankroll to be > $18,000.
The problem, as I see it, is not so much the Risk of Ruin, but your low E.V.
Flash, do you have any indisputable facts or references you can point to that back up your contentions? Or will you just continue waxing asinine, useless sludge on my topic. I'd appreciate it if you refrained on commenting on any of my topics in the future. To this end, you are THE charter member of my IGNORE LIST -- GOOD-FUC$&$G-BYE -- You remind me oh so much of the litany of alarmists that are oh so quick to point out that the building is on fire. No s*hit the building is on fire, how about offering a logical, helpful solution on how to put the fire out.
Don S. BJ ATTACK includes a SCORE of 40 for 1-8 spread on the S17 game I am going to play....a 1-16 spread on the alternative H17 lower minimum game has an extremely inferior SCORE of 24.
OK, let me ask one simple question:
What bankroll must I have to bet a spread of 1 to 8 in the game with the rules noted above to maintain about a 13.5% RoR OR LESS? I will play until bankroll is gone or I double it.
Spread will be as follows....
TC less than 1 = $25
TC 1 = $50
TC 2 = $100
TC 3 = $150
TC 4 = $200