Just go right ahead and use the 22 KISS indices from pg. 155 of Bluebook II. They will work just fine with Red 7. Be sure to change your IRC though. If you don't, then lower all the indices by 21 points each for the six deck game.V Lazlo said:I just finished reading BBII and am converting from Red7. Would using the R7 count with the KIII indices work? It would just be 1 less thing to change.
Thanks, enjoyed the book very much.Renzey said:Just go right ahead and use the 22 KISS indices from pg. 155 of Bluebook II. They will work just fine with Red 7. Be sure to change your IRC though. If you don't, then lower all the indices by 21 points each for the six deck game.
Do you use KIII right out of the box or did you do any modifications?prankster said:hi-
I don't know the answer to your question but Fred Renzey is a member of this websit. You might send him a PM. BTW I've used KISS III for years and it gets the $$$. :joker:
It is included on page 155beyondbj said:why kiss index dont include
10 vs dealer 10 ?
which seems is one of the illu 18 ?
really , but my old book seems not include thisV Lazlo said:It is included on page 155
The 2009 printing of Bluebook II has that play in the charts on page 155. The index number for six decks is "30". That number is semi-risk averse.beyondbj said:really , but my old book seems not include this
is there any update in new version?
Renzey said:The 2009 printing of Bluebook II has that play in the charts on page 155. The index number for six decks is "30". That number is semi-risk averse.
Since 2004, there has been extra information crammed onto about 20 scattered pages. The extra info deals mostly with H17 indices, player's EV with the KISS indices at neutral and "29" RC, player's overall EV at various RC's from "14" to "32", some dollar-per-hour improved yields from adding late surrender, a chart showing the TC vs. RC at various shoe depths, a simplified way to play the five -1 TC hand deviations, and some ROR charts for 4 hours, 25 hours and 300 hours of play using BJRM2002,beyondbj said:is that the only updated ? my version is 2004
and how about for one or two decks?
pls email me the updated pages if possible
I don't go too crazy with indices. I use the indice that tells me when to take insurance,15 or 16 vs dealers 10, 12vs 2 or 3, and of course if LS is offered I use it accordingly. In short-KISS III has been good to me. The best thing, by far that I ever did for my game was to buy and read Blackjack Bluebook II.V Lazlo said:Do you use KIII right out of the box or did you do any modifications?
Playing your negative index plays is not all that important since you'll have only 1 unit riding on them. Still, even in the shoe game, you'll still probably be around for the -1 TC deviations.HeadsUp said:In BBII p176 Fred say that hands with low counts need to be true counted.
Where is the complete chart of low counted hands?
Is this really that important to Kiss III BJ?
Yes, you would! The Insurance decision does come at a pretty high index number (+3 TC).HeadsUp said:Fred,
True fudging also applies to DDBJ but only regarding high index numbers right? Would you ever use the true fudging principle for insurance decisions as well in DDBJ?
Page 194 of BJBBII has a chart giving the results of KISS II and KISS III for both DD and 6D runs. Those results are shown in straight EV rather than in SCORE, with betting ramps that yield the same hourly standard deviations for both. They are:HeadsUp said:Fred,
Have you ever run a comparison of Kiss II vs III for DD and 4-6D outcomes?
With a higher PE, wouldn't it be better to play DD with Kiss II AND with a higher BC, wouldn't it be better to play 4-6D with Kiss III?