I can honestly tell you first hand, I can personally attest to this. Take Bryce Carlson, in BJFB for example, with his 11vX index, which is -6. I guarantee you that if you hit this @-7 with 2D or less(especially 1D or less)remaining you're losing money. If you're fortunate enough to get down to 1/2 deck to go, you can double this play ALL-DAY long @ RC-6(TC-12) and still nail those tens. Its also one of the reasons, I find myself being extremely conservartive with the Ao2s negative indices, deep in the deck. If you try and hit 13v3(-4) @ -5 w/1D remaining your gonna pay for it! But yet, this index seems to work perfectly with 4D remaining. I really wish I knew, how many decks Carlson used to generate his indices, because I can assure you their far from perfect! Unsure if its the floating advantage causing these inaccuricies, or if its, that they, were created with a compromise for any number decks in mind. Its one of the reasons, I dropped a 160$ bucks on CVData.
I might tend to agree that a TC of +4,(L2) , w/4D's remining, is very close to EV, as a TC of +4, with 2D's remaining, in a 6D game, but in no way do I agree that a TC of +6 in a 6D game, is egual to a TC of +6 in a 2D game at any given point.
