thelonelybull said:
Very good stuff, Renzey. I guess at some point it is just splitting hairs.
Yes, it is splitting hairs. Seldom will standing over hitting give you anywhere near a 1% better chance to win the hand over hitting. The other side of that coin is, 16 against a 10 in all its compositions, comes up more often than nearly any other holding
(about once every 28 hands).
BTW, all this "3-card-16" and "Rule of 45" stuff assumes you do not count cards. If you do, card counting supersedes everything, since your count knows more about your chances to improve your 16 than just what cards make up your 16.
For that matter, there is another level of playing 16 against a 10 that fits in between the Rule-of-45 and card counting. It's known as "board counting".
In essence, it's an "on-the-spot" freeze-frame snipet of card counting that can tell you a bit better than the Rule-of-45 what to do this time around. When you're dealt 16 against a 10, look around the board and tally up the "babies"
(2's thru 5's) and cancel them out against the 10's. If there are more babies on board than 10's -- stand, otherwise hit.
Thus, you should still hit your 8/4/4 against a 10 if there's one other player at the table and he holds 10/10. Likewise, you should stand with your 10/6 against a 10 if the other player holds 5/4/8/3 -- etc.
Once again, this is all to be superseded by counting down the shoe from the get-go.