Surrendering 17 vs. 10

[Automatic Monkey]

I'm curious, does anyone else here use that play? Using RPC I get a risk-averse index around +10 for it (roughly +5 in High-Low).

 

[avs21]

I'm curious, does anyone else here use that play? Using RPC I get a risk-averse index around +10 for it (roughly +5 in High-Low).

I would use it if I could find enough games that let you use LS. Only places I have played either they would think your an idiot or you will get thrown out. I guess it will draw attention like hitting 17 vs A, which I use.

 

[sagefr0g]

I'm curious, does anyone else here use that play? Using RPC I get a risk-averse index around +10 for it (roughly +5 in High-Low).

i've been tempted but never really knew the index for hi/lo for it till now.
i'll probably try it.

best regards,
mr fr0g

 

[zengrifter]

I'm curious, does anyone else here use that play? Using RPC I get a risk-averse index around +10 for it (roughly +5 in High-Low).

Yes, though seldom, as I also use the hit 17vA index infrequently as well. zg

 

[Cass]

I would use it if I could find enough games that let you use LS. Only places I have played either they would think your an idiot or you will get thrown out. I guess it will draw attention like hitting 17 vs A, which I use.

What is the index for hitting 17vs. A??

 

[zengrifter]

What is the index for hitting 17vs. A??

-5 HL approx. zg