D
Deleted member 3273
Guest
"-How would a TC coversion affect betting decsions? For example, how would it change the key ct., (IRC???) and pivot?" (FOR THE RED SEVEN)
for KO,that would depend on how you achieve true count conversion. The traditional method is to set the pivot at zero and the IRC at -4 * decks (which would be -24 for 6 deck games). Then you would calculate the true count by dividing the running count by the number of decks remaining.
To convert the K-O book 6 deck index values to true count indicies, subtract 4 to adjust for a pivot of zero, and then divide by 3. Thus the key count, given in the book as -4, becomes -8 when adjusted to a pivot of zero, and becomes a true count index of about -3. (It might be better to use -2, depending on the rules.)
The index in Appendix IV for 16 vs. 10 is given as -8. Subtract 4 to adjust for a pivot of zero and you get -12. Divide by 3 to get a true count index of -4.
----------------
for the red seven that means we subtract 2 to adjust for the pivot of zero and than divide by?......
Thanks,
for KO,that would depend on how you achieve true count conversion. The traditional method is to set the pivot at zero and the IRC at -4 * decks (which would be -24 for 6 deck games). Then you would calculate the true count by dividing the running count by the number of decks remaining.
To convert the K-O book 6 deck index values to true count indicies, subtract 4 to adjust for a pivot of zero, and then divide by 3. Thus the key count, given in the book as -4, becomes -8 when adjusted to a pivot of zero, and becomes a true count index of about -3. (It might be better to use -2, depending on the rules.)
The index in Appendix IV for 16 vs. 10 is given as -8. Subtract 4 to adjust for a pivot of zero and you get -12. Divide by 3 to get a true count index of -4.
----------------
for the red seven that means we subtract 2 to adjust for the pivot of zero and than divide by?......
Thanks,
Last edited by a moderator:
