6D, DAS, S17, 1-12 bet spread, $500 starting bankroll, 200 mill rounds
BRH-1 (with whole deck TC)
WR - 8.40
SCORE - 18.33
NO - 54, 564
RoR - 0.39%
SS-9 (with Rounded indexes)
WR - 15.13
SCORE - 10.47
NO - 85, 514
RoR - 17%
Basically these results show little difference than JJ's sim w/o the TC or the indexes. The numbers i provided are each particularly interesting
first - the SS-9 win return is significantly higher than BRH-1
second - the score significantly favors BRH-1
thrid - BRH-1 by far and away wins the RoR competition
So essentially it comes down to the question of whether its worth ss-9's risk for the increase in win return? That would depend on ur preference, but even i would have to say no. That is an EXTREME decrease in risk of ruin. Though the win return is almost double, the risk is over 10x.
Other Notes: You could manipulate bankroll sizes to give SS-9 a more favorable RoR, but upon decreasing the BR size, SS-9's RoR increases at a much faster rate than BRH-1.
Conclusion - alas Brett, it seems you have won.... not to be discouraged, i might have to stick with SS-9 just for fun and see how it turns out. If it doesn't, expect to hear from me haha.