Just did, thanks. :grin:BJFan said:It's not about BJ but worth mentioning it. Yesterday at my local store, number 29 in a single zero roulette landed 7 times in a row!!!! Have you heard about something like this?
BJFan
Flash,FLASH1296 said:I do not believe you.
My hunch is that YOU did not witness same.
So much for cover.BJFan said:Flash,
All I can tell you is that I was playing BJ very close to the roulette table and the dealer told the players to look at the display of the roulette table and I could read the seven ocurrences of the 29. We kept talking about this all the afternoon. If it was an error of the display I can't tell you but I saw it, for sure, and the same goes for all the people at the BJ table.
Regards,
BJFan
Exactly my thinking. Someone yelling at crazy "Look at the screen! there is 16, 31, 3, 34, 33, 27, 9. How unlikely is that ?" - and you would think he turned mental.London Colin said:This kind of thing always causes me to question my understanding, but surely seven 29s is no less likely than any other sequence of seven numbers? The unlikely thing would be to predict it ahead of time.
Pit15,pit15 said:I'm sure it's happened, whether the OP is lying about it or not I obviously can't say (nor do I really care)
This is so wrong, because you didn't witness this by yourself - someone else pointed this out to you to watch. That is a major difference people often neglect.pit15 said:So the odds of witnessing something like this is about 15 times less likely then winning the mega millions with a single lottery ticket.
Note the "single lottery ticket" comment. The odds are for viewing a single series of spins. Of course the real odds are a bit higher since when it does end up happening it draws a ton of attention.MangoJ said:This is so wrong, because you didn't witness this by yourself - someone else pointed this out to you to watch. That is a major difference people often neglect.
If you spend an hour in the casino, there will be hundreds of roulette rolls in that time you didn't notice. Your chance of someone pointing out that streak shrinks from "1 in 2.5 billion" down to "1 in 25 million".
If you spend 1000 hours a year in a casino, that will be "1 in 25,000" per year.
On this board, if there are 100 people who would post such non-sense, it only takes "1 in 250" to observe this message on this board (per year!).
It is nothing THAT unlikely to read it here on the board. Since there is a ridiculous high number of such sequences, it doesn't surprise me to read it up here.
It's doubtful the dealer was playing around with it.The Chaperone said:Assuming a 00 wheel, the odds are 1 in 3,010,936,384 which is 38^6. It is possible with the huge sample of spins (everyone in a casino when something like this happens would know about it) and the large sample of forum posters, but I would still say some type of display malfunction or manipulation by the dealer would be a big favorite. If the table is empty the dealer could be playing games with the wheel or even just putting the ball in 29 over and over again. Maybe the dealer did it 5 times before someone came up to play and then the next two spins were randomly also 29s and the onlookers went crazy. Who knows...