I hear you, man. The down swing can really break one's nerves. That is why I have to give a lot of credit to people like Kewljason who play BJ for a living.21forme said:Recently, I was playing a DD game with excellent rules, including 90% pen, spreading 1-15. In an hour, I was down close to 200 units.
Fortunately, I got most of it back in the next hour.
Yes. Attention-getting, but no big deal in the long run.Dyepaintball12 said:If variance was a current event it would be the BP Oil Spill.
I have learned to look at variance exactly the same way as Monkey, and I guess Snyder, although I personally don't remember reading his view. While varience is indeed a bitch, it is what prevents the masses from playing a winning game and allows us to do so. Without it, the industry would stop offering any kind of beatable game, so variance is actually your friend. I know this thinking is of little consequence when you hit one of those substantial downslides though.Automatic Monkey said:Yes. Attention-getting, but no big deal in the long run.
I like Snyder's take on variance, that it's the only thing that allows us to continue playing.
...sadly now that WoO has posted about it in his most recent update I think there might be trouble getting a table.21forme said:Just for the record, my original title was different than what appears. The mods edited it
I understand (and tolerate) variance just fine. However, it always gets my wife. I keep saying, "it doesn't matter. Think long term."
However, to get hit like that on such an amazing game is still noteworthy. House edge less than 0.2%, etc. I'm sure some AP will have a similar experience during an upcoming promo on the east coast where player edge is +1.5%.
I wish there was a head shaking animoticon for this. Or a forehead smacking one. monkey, you should get a show like glen beck. you're really good at saying head turning comments.Automatic Monkey said:Yes. Attention-getting, but no big deal in the long run.