That's how you have to be - there is no room to play hunches, no matter how much you want to.aslan said:You guys are so rational it's scary! lol
RJT.
That's how you have to be - there is no room to play hunches, no matter how much you want to.aslan said:You guys are so rational it's scary! lol
I am just showing that in one possible shoe comp and probably more that betting and playing like a good counter would is negative EV. I am also saying in that particular instance that a KO counter does in fact have a positive EV, but it is not attainable unless he is a super player capable of perfect playing strategy (such as standing on 12 v 10) because he knows the precise deck comp, I couldn't do it, could you?EasyRhino said:Oh, wait, so if I understand, you're saying that having a game where all of the 7s, 8s, and 9s, were played would give a signal to a KO player to bet more?
It would. However, I also think that 7s have an effect of removal that is positive for player expectation. So maybe a player should bet more if such an unusual shoe were to play out?
If you want to fool around with hunches, there are enough close plays where you can guess with no significant difference either way. You can also work your guessing into your act if you so desire. (Ref: ZG's coin-flip play.)k_c said:I am just showing that in one possible shoe comp and probably more that betting and playing like a good counter would is negative EV. I am also saying in that particular instance that a KO counter does in fact have a positive EV, but it is not attainable unless he is a super player capable of perfect playing strategy (such as standing on 12 v 10) because he knows the precise deck comp, I couldn't do it, could you?
Also, I tried to point out that this is just one shoe comp in the larger picture. It probably has a relatively low probability of occurring, so if you bet and play like a good counter would you could still have positive EV over a large number of shoe compositions with the same count/pen.
The question was if is whether is it wise to be wary of some high counts and bet less because of your "gut." I guess the answer is no unless you have studied your particular counting system and have a knowledge of its weaknesses (or unless you have a proven championship caliber gut:grin:.)
k_c
Chanpionship caliber gut; i.e., photographic memory and instant recall. lol Points well taken.k_c said:I am just showing that in one possible shoe comp and probably more that betting and playing like a good counter would is negative EV. I am also saying in that particular instance that a KO counter does in fact have a positive EV, but it is not attainable unless he is a super player capable of perfect playing strategy (such as standing on 12 v 10) because he knows the precise deck comp, I couldn't do it, could you?
Also, I tried to point out that this is just one shoe comp in the larger picture. It probably has a relatively low probability of occurring, so if you bet and play like a good counter would you could still have positive EV over a large number of shoe compositions with the same count/pen.
The question was if is whether is it wise to be wary of some high counts and bet less because of your "gut." I guess the answer is no unless you have studied your particular counting system and have a knowledge of its weaknesses (or unless you have a proven championship caliber gut:grin:.)
k_c