What is the win rate in $ for this game?

[shinyam]

Hi,

Can anyone tell me what the win rate per hour is under the following conditions?

six decks
83% penetration
DA2, DAS, S17, Resplit up to 4 times, split aces receive one card only

Betting schedule: Stay out at TC lower than -1, $25 at -1 to 1, $30 at +1, $50 at +2, and $100 and +3 and higher. Also, what if I played two hands at +2 ($50 each), and two $100 hands at +3 or higher?


Thanks in advance. I really need this info, and would appreciate it. I need to know if this game is worth playing.

 

[kewljason]

this is decent penetration and rules for a 6 deck game (assuming you mean stand 17 rather than stand 16), but such a small spread will probably barely get you into positive EV territory. You need a bigger spread to win any reasonable money.

 

[jack.jackson]

hi-lo sweet16&fab4

Hi,

Can anyone tell me what the win rate per hour is under the following conditions?

six decks
83% penetration
DA2, DAS, S16, Resplit up to 4 times, split aces receive one card only

Betting schedule: Stay out at TC lower than -1, $25 at -1 to 1, $30 at +1, $50 at +2, and $100 and +3 and higher. Also, what if I played two hands at +2 ($50 each), and two $100 hands at +3 or higher?


Thanks in advance. I really need this info, and would appreciate it. I need to know if this game is worth playing.

1 Hand(-1)(wong out at -2)

100hands/per hour

WR=$12.38
RoR=35%

*50hands/per hour

WR=$6.19
RoR=35%

1 Hand(0)(wong out at -1)

100hands/per hour

WR=$28.00
RoR=5.9%

Two hands(-1)

WR=$32.71
RoR=24.7%

Two-Hands(0)

WR=$48.78
RoR=10.2%

*Exactly half the Win-Rate v 100hands per hour

10K BR

 

[kewljason]

I find these results very interesting. 1.) I'm not sure how you can come up with a RoR since the poster didn't give a BR amount. 2.) I find the 100 hand comparision between wong out @ -1 and wong out @ -2 a much greater difference than I would have expected. The win rate more than doubled, while the RofR went from 35% to 6%. Shows the real importance of being strict and getting out when the count gets to -1. Sometimes I am a bit lacks doing so when conditions are crowded.

 

[jack.jackson]

I find these results very interesting. 1.) I'm not sure how you can come up with a RoR since the poster didn't give a BR amount. 2.) I find the 100 hand comparision between wong out @ -1 and wong out @ -2 a much greater difference than I would have expected. The win rate more than doubled, while the RofR went from 35% to 6%. Shows the real importance of being strict and getting out when the count gets to -1. Sometimes I am a bit lacks doing so when conditions are crowded.

My bad, I was assuming a 10k BR.

I thought the same thing when I seen this on CVCX. Btw, not sure how many hands one would get at 0> and above.

-1 has a frequency of 45.18% compared to 25.98% @0

 

[shinyam]

Thanks so much for the info jack,jackson, I really appreciate it. The info you provided me with is very important, as the results are dramatically different. Will play accordingly.

 

[shinyam]

this is decent penetration and rules for a 6 deck game (assuming you mean stand 17 rather than stand 16), but such a small spread will probably barely get you into positive EV territory. You need a bigger spread to win any reasonable money.

Yes, sorry it's S17. I edited my post.

 

[jack.jackson]

Thanks so much for the info jack,jackson, I really appreciate it. The info you provided me with is very important, as the results are dramatically different. Will play accordingly.

Dont mention it :cool2: