So high as to be irrelevant; probably north of +12 (HiLo/per-deck).CapJack said:After splitting 10's what would the TC need to be to DD on a soft 21?
14, 12, 10, 8, 8 vs. 2-6 respectively.CapJack said:After splitting 10's what would the TC need to be to DD on a soft 21?
LOL! But, you might want to change "in the plurality" to "in the plural."xengrifter said:So high as to be irrelevant; probably north of +12 (HiLo/per-deck).
The more important question is... (I got this Don)
...Why in the hell did you write tens in the plurality with an apostrophe denoting possession??
Do you have the indices for halves? I'm guessing it would be maybe 15, 13, 11, 9, 9?DSchles said:14, 12, 10, 8, 8 vs. 2-6 respectively.
Meanwhile, ... don't do it!!
Don
DSchles said:LOL! But, you might want to change "in the plurality" to "in the plural."
No, sorry.ZenKinG said:Do you have the indices for halves? I'm guessing it would be maybe 15, 13, 11, 9, 9?
Your guess is good enough...ZenKinG said:Do you have the indices for halves? I'm guessing it would be maybe 15, 13, 11, 9, 9?
My guess would be indices that are virtually the same as Hi-Lo.xengrifter said:Your guess is good enough...
...knowing the precise index ADDS NOTHING (as does even using it).
Just what I was looking for. Thank you.DSchles said:14, 12, 10, 8, 8 vs. 2-6 respectively.
Meanwhile, ... don't do it!!
Don
Looking for what?CapJack said:Just what I was looking for. Thank you.
Well since always right.CapJack said:After splitting 10's what would the TC need to be to DD on a soft 21?