Flash, wouldnt you be more likely to win the first hand, from a single deck game, than let's say a 6 deck game, with the same rules????FLASH1296 said:
The number of decks does not matter.
42.9% Wins with S17 [slightly lower with H17]
8.9% Pushes with S17 [slightly lower with H17]
So that is to say you have a 51.8% chance of winning or breaking even. Which of course does not warrant going against a 48.2% chance of losing. It just goes to demonstrate why counters wait until the likelihood of better-paying naturals is highest, as well as the chances of winning on doubles and splits, before raising their bets.FLASH1296 said:
The number of decks does not matter.
42.9% Wins with S17 [slightly lower with H17]
8.9% Pushes with S17 [slightly lower with H17]
Not sure flash1296, but according to our strategy engine the HE for 1D H17 DAS is .04 while its .66 for 6D with the same rules. So wouldnt you be more likely to win the first hand from the single deck game, since it has a lower HE?FLASH1296 said:There is no significant difference that I can see.
My question for you is — why would there be ?