True, but let me go a step further. People look at Giffin's PE and BC calcs, using his EORs, and see a great gain in side counts. But, his calcs were based on a huge number of side count adjustments, as well as single-deck play and deep penetration. Side counts do not realize the gain to PE that exist theoretically without enormous effort, and perfect play on a huge number of perfect adjustments.
I'd like to say the opposite, since my software is the only software that supports these adjustments. But, I think it is a waste of time.