Thanks a lot for the quick response. Appreciated.
The toss up of course is the benefit of applying these deviations against the risk of getting noticed (playing a solid game and then not splitting 2s), or heat from other players when doing something that looks silly.
Dont mention it! Unlike some of the other "ipre-defined" strategies, included in CVCX, the HI-LO strategies, dont specify the # of deck's, being used. I assume these are a compromise for any number of decks. (Rules are independent) Maybe Qfit might know?
If you wanted specific indices(#of decks, rules,etc) then you would need someone to customize them for you, with the "index generation" tool, using CVData.
Then agian, this is really getting down to the nuts and bolts of it.
There are few if any splits that I use indices for - and I use a lot of indices (90 approx). zgCan anyone post a complete list of splitting indexes for Hi-Lo? I appreciate their of little real $/£ value in the longer term, but am interested out of curiousity.
Thanks.
There are few if any splits that I use indices for - and I use a lot of indices (90 approx). zg