A b.a. L4

jack.jackson · Jul 24, 2007

Code:

                    Play.&
                    Insur. Only
   Primary       Secondary      

   A    -4           6              BC. .997
                                    PE. .697
   2     2                          IC. .912
   3     3
   4     3
   5     4
   6     3

   7     2           1
   8     0           2
   9    -1

   X    -3

This is about as powerful of a balanced count that you can get. What makes this unique is that were not sidecounting any cards. The primary count is for betting purposes. The secondary count is what will add to the primary count for playing and insurance purposes. Just count A,7,8 as +6,+1 &,2 for the secondary.
For example say the first ten cards are as follows: A,K,J,8,A T,4,7,3,5

The primary count is -5 The secondary is +15

Add +15 to -5=+10 for playing and insurance purposes only. Then revert back to -5 and carry on.

If i get enough views ill post the indexes and bet strategy. Bjmath. analyzer 3.5

zengrifter · Jul 24, 2007

The mad scientist of counting strikes again! zg

aslan · Jul 26, 2007

jack said:
Code:

Play.& Insur. Only Primary Secondary A -4 6 BC. .997 PE. .697 2 2 IC. .912 3 3 4 3 5 4 6 3 7 2 1 8 0 2 9 -1 X -3

This is about as powerful of a balanced count that you can get. What makes this unique is that were not sidecounting any cards. The primary count is for betting purposes. The secondary count is what will add to the primary count for playing and insurance purposes. Just count A,7,8 as +6,+1 &,2 for the secondary.
For example say the first ten cards are as follows: A,K,J,8,A T,4,7,3,5

The primary count is -5 The secondary is +15

Add +15 to -5=+10 for playing and insurance purposes only. Then revert back to -5 and carry on.

If i get enough views ill post the indexes and bet strategy. Bjmath. analyzer 3.5

Wouldn't it be great if mere mortals like myself could actually execute such a system? I think I'd need a small computer device embedded under my skin.

PS--On second thought the computer would be cheating and my fear of incarceration would not allow me to take such a chance.

Kasi · Jul 26, 2007

jack said:
Piece of cake for Super coolmancool

jack.jackson · Jul 28, 2007

Push your limits

Code:

                 Play&
                Insur.            Betting            OSR: 1:4 is 98.67
             Primary           Secondary
    A          1                   -5                      BC: .997
                                                           PE: .70
    2          1                    1                      IC: .916
    3          1                    2
    4          2                    1
    5          3                    1
    6          2                    1

    7          2                    0
    8          1                   -1
    9         -1

    X         -3
______________________________________________
               0                   0

If you combine the difference of the two counts you'll get the level 4 above.
Also if you were to use the level 4 above for the primary and use the secondary the way its shown for the play of hands. The results stay the same.

I had a really tough time firguring out the unbalanced secondary count in the count shown above THIS one. So i punched in numbers for hours until i could find two balanced counts with a high BC and a high PE.

YA, this is about as wierd as they come. But i believe if your experienced. This a count that could actually be implemented into play.

Just add the two count together for betting purposes only. Bj math analyzer 3.5

jack.jackson · Jul 30, 2007

For Reading only

jack said:
Code:

Play& Insur. Betting OSR: 1:4 is 98.74 Primary Secondary A 1 -4.5(-9) BC: .999 PE: .699 2 1 1.5(3) IC: .90 3 1 1.5(3) 4 2 1(2) Exact 5 3 1(2) BC: .9984270(+180)=9984450 6 2 .5(1) PE: .699,22,65(-22) IC: .9,158,109(-158) 7 2 8 1 -1(-2) 9 -1 X -3 ______________________________________________ 0 0

Code:

If you combine the difference of the two counts you'll get the level 4 above.
Also if you were to use the level 4 above for the primary and use the secondary the way its shown for the play of hands. The results stay the same.

I had a really tough time firguring out the unbalanced secondary count in the count shown above THIS one. So i punched in numbers for hours until i could find two balanced counts with a high BC and a high PE.

YA, this is about as wierd as they come. But i believe if your experienced. This a count that could actually be implemented into play.

Just add the two count together for betting purposes only. Bj math analyzer 3.5

Ive actually decided to tweak this out a little. Unfortunately, i hade to use halves in order to do so. That being the case i was compelled to double there value. No problem, you just take half the running total of the secondary and add that to your primary count for betting.

Believe it or not the primary count is easy to master. Once you master the primary count start training your self to recognise the different values of the cards for the secondary. Then when your ready start keeping both counts.
I have by no means mastered this count. And maybe never will. But i find fun and exiciting that im at least attempting to do so!

I could've tweaked even more by breaking the secondary down in tenths. And valuing them by X10 and taking 1/10 the sum of that. For a BC of .99999

jack.jackson · Jul 31, 2007

jack said:

Code:

                 Play&       Betting             OSR: 1:4
                Insur.         a           b           c          d             
             Primary         98.67       98.70       98.75     98.80
    A          1               -5         -4.5       -4.5       -4.5
                                                        
    2          1                1           1         1.5         1
    3          1                2           2         1.5        1.5
    4          2                1           1          1          1
    5          3                1           1          1          1
    6          2                1          .5          1         .5

    7          2                0           0        -.5        -.5
    8          1               -1          -1         -1         -1
    9         -1

    X         -3
______________________________________________
               0               0           0           0        -1

Here i would like to demonstrate the differences in the secondary. Of course for conveince i would double thier value and take half the sum.

I actually like secondary C. D is unbalanced which im not that familiar with.My next step is to get some software. Learn how to use it and see what i come up with.

jack.jackson · Aug 1, 2007

Heres the actual system in its true form.

Code:

                                       Pri.          Sec.
               Pri.      Sec.          X2           X4
     A         .5        -4            1           -16    OSR: 1:4 98.81  
                                                               1:60 99.95
     2          1       1.25           2            5
     3         1.5       1             3            4        Exact
     4          2       1.25           4            5       BC: .9998303
     5          3        1             6            4       PE:  .6999273(-27)
                                                            IC:  .9121403(-12)
     6          2       .75            4            3      BC
     7          2      -.25            4           -1     +27= .9998330
     8          1       -1             2           -4     +12= .9998450
     9         -1                     -2                        =.9999  
                                                          BC: .9999 =1
     X         -3                     -6                  PE: .6999 =.70     
_______________________________________________________   IC:.90=.90   
                0        0             0            0

The OSR will actually max itself out at 99.983 with an ifinite spread. Your OSR will always match your BC when maxed out.

A b.a. L4

jack.jackson

Well-Known Member

zengrifter

Banned

aslan

Well-Known Member

Kasi

Well-Known Member

jack.jackson

Well-Known Member

jack.jackson

Well-Known Member

jack.jackson

Well-Known Member

jack.jackson

Well-Known Member