Secretarriat said:
G Man, I thought I wrote "That doesn’t necessarily mean the ASM is rigged". BJGenius said it earlier. the big cards could be anywhere. They are not intentionally hidden behind the cut card by the casino. As long as the players cut the cards, the casino can't do that. Nobody said anything like this here. Why do you say that?
Now why not bet up if count rises? Well we are talking about a very specific situation here. It's not as if it looks like it's the shoe of the day.
if RC goes +20,+25, +30 every other shoe (or most of them) odds are you are getting killed with max bets because the high cards do not come out.
The wong-out proposition at strong negative counts is obviously correct although it's possible to survive with adequate card-play.
Like you, I would like to see videos from Kjewjl if he has the machine but if it's been "tricked" it would probably look like CV with the Bias set at random extreme levels. Then you'd frequently see RCs between +40 and -40.
Now why not bet up if count rises? Well we are talking about a very specific situation here. It's not as if it looks like it's the shoe of the day.
if RC goes +20,+25, +30 every other shoe (or most of them) odds are you are getting killed with max bets because the high cards do not come out.
The wong-out proposition at strong negative counts is obviously correct although it's possible to survive with adequate card-play.
Like you, I would like to see videos from Kjewjl if he has the machine but if it's been "tricked" it would probably look like CV with the Bias set at random extreme levels. Then you'd frequently see RCs between +40 and -40.