I think it's a combination of it takes more time to deal to 2 players than one, and 2 players take up more table space than one.Mr. T said:Can some knowledgeable person explain to me why the casino says a $10 player is more profitable to them than 2 $5 players, and a $25 player is more profitable than 3 $10 players.
Same reason. 3 players take up more spots and it takes more time to deal to them. You can get more hands to the one guy, and free up 2 more spots for others to lose money on.Mr. T said:OK the first part is easy to explain away. But how about a $25 player being more profitable than 3 $10 players.
Apart from saying this again, do you have the numbers, facts and figures to show exactly how much the casino win from 1 $25 player and how much is the equivalent win from 3 $10 players. In other words show me the figures and I will beleive you.ScottH said:Same reason. 3 players take up more spots and it takes more time to deal to them. You can get more hands to the one guy, and free up 2 more spots for others to lose money on.
I don't have any figures, so I guess don't believe me then!Mr. T said:Apart from saying this again, do you have the numbers, facts and figures to show exactly how much the casino win from 1 $25 player and how much is the equivalent win from 3 $10 players. In other words show me the figures and I will beleive you.
Scott, you know what Mr. T says: "I aint got no time for no jibber jabber!"ScottH said:I don't have any figures, so I guess don't believe me then!![]()
Fo'! :grin:ChefJJ said:Scott, you know what Mr. T says: "I aint got no time for no jibber jabber!"