My bad. I misread your post. I know this site often features guests during its chat sessions, and I assumed that this is what you were talking about.Richard Munchkin said:Southpaw, it is not a chat session. I do a radio show on Thursday nights in Vegas. If you click on either link in my signature you can get more info.
As would I!Lonesome Gambler said:I would be eager to hear Bob's opinion on this subject.
ZG's opinion, while we wait: Spooking is illegal-cheating, in Nevada anyway.Lonesome Gambler said:I would be eager to hear Bob's opinion on this subject.
Gotta agree with zg on this one.zengrifter said:ZG's opinion, while we wait: Spooking is illegal-cheating, in Nevada anyway.
What have been cases where there was a conviction or trial?Richard Munchkin said:Now I'm sure a bunch of people will jump in here and tell you that spooking is illegal. That is an opinion as far as I know, not a fact. I don't believe there has ever been a spooking case conviction or even a trial that I am aware of.
That sounds more like Billy Walters. z:laugh:gRichard Munchkin said:One of my favorite quotes from my book was Chip Reese saying,
"Just because I haven't done anything wrong doesn't mean I won't have to defend myself some day."
Which one do you NOT agree with? zpaddywhack said:Gotta agree with zg on this one.
Along similar lines, a qualified legal opinion can be rendered that holecarding is an illicit act.Richard Munchkin said:Now I'm sure a bunch of people will jump in here and tell you that spooking is illegal. That is an opinion as far as I know, not a fact. I don't believe there has ever been a spooking case conviction or even a trial that I am aware of. Bob Nersesian is the guest this week on Gambling With an Edge, and if we get time I will ask him about this.
If Bob Nersesian posted this, I MIGHT give weight to his opinion, based on reputation alone, but I'd probably expect even him to explain his reasoning and the authority on which it was based. When zengrifter says this, I can't bring myself to attach any importance to it.zengrifter said:ZG's opinion, while we wait: Spooking is illegal-cheating, in Nevada anyway.
I thought that I properly qualified my comment with this --WRX said:If Bob Nersesian posted this, I MIGHT give weight to his opinion, based on reputation alone, but I'd probably expect even him to explain his reasoning and the authority on which it was based. When zengrifter says this, I can't bring myself to attach any importance to it.
My initial opinion was conventional, and I did not read Richard's observation initially.zengrifter said:Along similar lines, a qualified legal opinion can be rendered that holecarding is an illicit act.
On the flip side, the Nevada Device Law, [ostensibly a] ban against hidden computer use, has some shaky Constitutional
conflicts and has never been sufficiently tested. zg
Well, there have been cases that went to the Supreme Court where they ruled that hole carding is legal. There have been cases brought to trial where they ruled using a hidden computer is illegal.bobstaman said:What have been cases where there was a conviction or trial?
I think a whole book could be written about what people have done to get a civilian out of a seat.pit15 said:I've stood and stared at ploppies for hours. Sometimes it works and makes them uncomfortable enough to leave, a lot of times it doesn't. If it's clear you're making someone uncomfortable, start standing closer to them.