advantage player backoffs come in all shapes and sizes
Here we are speaking about MGM, a huge casino, with a big database. At another casino we might be speaking about a place with half dozen tables or less.
Decisions are made by shift managers in many big places but might be made by a pit boss in smaller places.
Decisions are made solely on your blackjack play in one place while another place might look into their computer and see that you or your wife lose more money on machines than you can make at blackjack, making you an acceptable player.
Some places have an excepted or just a sort of tolerance level. Since MGM does not rate a player who averages less than $25, do they actually look at a low rolling counter on a $5 table, spreading 5-50 or so? While many of us have learned that most Coast casinos certainly would be watching this guy?
Pits tend to dislike new computer programs, especially ones that could possibly cost pit jobs and it is reasonable to believe that surviellance types feel the same way. Might they under use or even sabotoge these programs?
If there is one thing I have learned it is that every casino, even some within the same corporation is different. Often you can go even a step further and in some casinos every shift can be different. I can think of 3 Vegas casinos on the same corner that I have played in often enough to say: I play a different style in the MGM, Tropicana and NYNY and even play differently within shifts at these places. Consider this a competition or even a war, the more you know about your opponent, the better your chances of being successful.
ihate17