Bet spread

vneck

Member
Top Poster Of Month
Why do most bet spread switch to 2 hands at the upper level? Is 2 hands of $200 better EV than 1 have of 400? If so, why not play 2 hands through entire bet spread where table minimums allow it?
 

Strizkiz

Member
Lower variance with two hands on big bets. With minimum bets you want the least amount on the felt as possible. If the minimum is $10 by playing two hands youre playing two hands at $20. Now youre playing $40 with no edge instead of $10
 

DSchles

Well-Known Member
vneck said:
Why do most bet spread switch to 2 hands at the upper level? Is 2 hands of $200 better EV than 1 have of 400? If so, why not play 2 hands through entire bet spread where table minimums allow it?
No, it's worse EV, because it uses up more cards for the same EV. If you spread to two hands, in order to keep the same ROR as for one hand, you have to bet approximately 75% of the one-hand wager on each of the two hands. So, if you were to bet $400 on one hand, you ought to bet two hands of $300 each. That way, your EV increases but you ROR remains the same.

Finally, this works best when there are other players at the table with you and you aren't playing alone.

Don
 
Top