Several players have mentioned this concept to me over recent months. I finally took a good look at the ‘Floating Advantage’ chapter in Schlesinger’s Blackjack Attack.
So it seems that in theory a true count at a deeper penetration is better than the same true count at a not-so-deep level. However the additional advantage that can actually be gained by betting more at the deeper penetration level is minimal i.e. it adds 1-2% to the player’s win rate – e.g. increase from 2 units to 2.04 units per hour.
So I am thinking that I should not bother trying to adjust my game to incorporate the floating advantage theory?
Do others agree?
So it seems that in theory a true count at a deeper penetration is better than the same true count at a not-so-deep level. However the additional advantage that can actually be gained by betting more at the deeper penetration level is minimal i.e. it adds 1-2% to the player’s win rate – e.g. increase from 2 units to 2.04 units per hour.
So I am thinking that I should not bother trying to adjust my game to incorporate the floating advantage theory?
Do others agree?